Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 3;77(1):18.
doi: 10.1186/s43044-025-00611-9.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparative safety and effectiveness of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Muhammad Furqan et al. Egypt Heart J. .

Abstract

Background: Over the past fifty years, the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) has tripled. Traditionally, the main treatment for this condition has been pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) performed using radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). However, another technique known as cryoballoon ablation (CBA) has been developed as another option for managing this heart rhythm disorder. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF.

Methods: This study compared the safety and effectiveness of CBA and RFCA for the treatment of AF using a thorough review of randomized controlled trials up until June 1, 2023.

Results: The results revealed that CBA and RFCA had similar effectiveness and safety profiles in achieving freedom from AF (RR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.07, p = 0.99) and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.10, p = 0.79). CBA was faster (MD = - 23.99; 95% CI: - 32.98 to - 15.00; p < 0.00001) with a higher risk of phrenic nerve palsy (RR = 6.88; 95% CI: 3.26 to 14.50, p < 0.00001). Acute PVI rate (RR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.01, p = 0.95), overall complications (RR = 1.37; 95% CI: 0.93 to 2.01, p = 0.11), pericardial effusion (RR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.41, p = 0.24), and fluoroscopy time (MD = 1.63; 95% CI: - 2.06 5.32; p = 0.39) did not significantly differ between the two procedures.

Conclusions: CBA and RFCA offer similar outcomes for patients with AF and PAF, with CBA being quicker but carrying a slightly higher risk of phrenic nerve palsy.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Cryoballoon; Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Radiofrequency ablation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of study selection. RCT = Randomized Control Trial
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Quality judgments about each risk of bias item
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot for the proportion of patients free from AF in all 19 studies. AF indicates atrial fibrillation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot for the proportion of patients free from AF in 11 studies only containing participants with paroxysmal AF. AF indicates atrial fibrillation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The funnel plot for the proportion of patients free from AF. AF indicates atrial fibrillation

References

    1. Ki IY, Nishida K, Kato T, Nattel S (2011) Atrial fibrillation pathophysiology: implications for management. Circulation 124(20):2264–2274 - PubMed
    1. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D’Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D (1998) Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 98(10):946–952 - PubMed
    1. Kornej J, Börschel CS, Benjamin EJ, Schnabel RB (2020) Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in the 21st Century: novel methods and new insights. Circ Res 127(1):4–20 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Staerk L, Sherer JA, Ko D, Benjamin EJ, Helm RH (2017) Atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical outcomes. Circ Res 120(9):1501–1517 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buiatti A, von Olshausen G, Barthel P, Schneider S, Luik A, Kaess B, Laugwitz K-L, Hoppmann P (2017) Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. EP Eur 19(3):378–384. 10.1093/europace/euw262 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources