Outcome prediction, quality of life, and life expectancy in metastatic spine tumors: WFNS spine committee recommendation

Abstract

This review aimed to formulate the most current, evidence-based recommendations for the prediction of outcome, life expectancy, and quality of life in patients with metastatic vertebral tumors. A systematic literature search on PubMed and Google Scholar from 2012-2022 was done, using the keywords "metastatic vertebral tumors + outcome prediction + prognoses," "quality of life + spine metastases," and "spine metastases + life expectancy." Our PubMed search yielded 402 articles for outcome prediction, whereas 40 articles were identified for life expectancy in spine metastases. These were carefully screened by the co-authors, resulting in 61 and 11 final articles analyzed for this study. Our PubMed search for quality of life yielded 137 articles, of which 63 were carefully analyzed for this study. This up-to-date information was reviewed at two separate Spine Committee meetings of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS). Two rounds of the Delphi method were used to vote and arrive at a positive or negative consensus. The WFNS Spine Committee finalized seven recommendation guidelines on the prediction of outcome, life expectancy, and quality of life in metastatic vertebral tumors. Irrespective of the primary tumor, surgical decompression in appropriately selected patients potentially improves the quality of life. Pre-operative ambulatory status, overall performance, and age are independent predictors of outcome and overall survival. Prognostic scoring systems have evolved to principle-based algorithms, amongst which NOMS is the most widely used.The best tools to measure the quality of life are EUQOL5-D and SOSGOQ in patients with metastatic spine disease.

Keywords: Life expectancy; Outcome prediction; Prognostic scores; Quality of life; Vertebral metastases.