Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May;36(5):662-670.
doi: 10.1111/clr.14413. Epub 2025 Feb 3.

Accuracy, Safety, and Efficiency in Robotic-Assisted vs. Freehand Dental Implant Surgery: A 6-Month Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Trial

Jiaxian Chen  1   2 , Yulan Wang  1   2 , Yi Bai  1   2 , Yan Chen  1   2 , Zhenqi Chen  1   2 , Qi Yan  1   2 , Yufeng Zhang  1   2   3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Accuracy, Safety, and Efficiency in Robotic-Assisted vs. Freehand Dental Implant Surgery: A 6-Month Follow-Up Randomized Controlled Trial

Jiaxian Chen et al. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the implant accuracy, safety, and efficiency between robotic-assisted and freehand dental implant placement with a half-year follow-up.

Methods: Patients requiring single-tooth implant restorations were recruited and randomized into two groups: robotic-assisted surgery and freehand implant surgery. The accuracy of implant positioning was compared by assessing immediate postoperative CBCT scans against preoperative planning software. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded, and data were analyzed using an intention-to-treat approach. The time required for implant placement in each group was documented. A 6-month follow-up measured the implant survival rates.

Results: The study included 24 patients (median age 36, 18 female). In the robotic-assisted surgery group, the average platform global deviation, apex global deviation, and angular deviation were 0.70 ± 0.11 mm, 0.70 ± 0.12 mm, and 1.09° ± 0.67°, respectively. In the freehand implant surgery group, these measures were 1.24 ± 0.59 mm, 2.13 ± 1.26 mm, and 7.43° ± 6.12°, respectively, with statistically significant differences. Regarding the duration of surgery, the robotic-assisted surgery group required 18.8 ± 4.89 min. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were similar across both groups, and the implant survival rate was 100% in both groups at the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions: This study found that robot-assisted implant placement offers higher accuracy in implant positioning compared to freehand placement, while requiring longer operation times. Future developments should focus on simplifying the registration and design of robot systems to enhance efficiency and facilitate their broader clinical adoption.

Keywords: dental implant; digital dentistry; positional accuracy; robot assisted surgery; survival rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alterman, M., H. Rushinek, A. Lavi, and N. Casap. 2019. “Computerized Navigation for Minimal Invasive Retrieval of Displaced Dental Implants in the Lower Jaw.” Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 31: 447–455.
    1. Aydemir, C. A., and V. Arısan. 2020. “Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement via Dynamic Navigation or the Freehand Method: A Split‐Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.” Clinical Oral Implants Research 31: 255–263.
    1. Bahrami, R., M. Pourhajibagher, N. Nikparto, and A. Bahador. 2024. “Robot‐Assisted Dental Implant Surgery Procedure: A Literature Review.” Journal of Dental Sciences 19: 1359–1368.
    1. Block, M., R. Emery, K. Lank, and J. Ryan. 2017. “Implant Placement Accuracy Using Dynamic Navigation.” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 32: 92–99.
    1. Block, M. S., and R. W. Emery. 2016. “Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement—Choosing the Method of Guidance.” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 74: 269–277.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources