Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0316028.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316028. eCollection 2025.

Utilizing MV-FLOW™ and multidimensional ultrasound characteristics for prognosticating FET outcomes in RIF patients: Study Protocol for a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Utilizing MV-FLOW™ and multidimensional ultrasound characteristics for prognosticating FET outcomes in RIF patients: Study Protocol for a cross-sectional study

Ying Zhou et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a common issue in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). Prior to transfer, uterine endometrial receptivity of FET patients can be assessed using multimodal transvaginal ultrasound indicators to predict the success rate of the current FET cycle. Endometrial blood flow is a crucial element in evaluating endometrial receptivity. MV-FLOW™ is an advanced two-dimensional superb microvascular imaging technology that can detect and display blood flow in micro-vessels. The data for this study were obtained from an ongoing cross-sectional study comprising 323 RIF patients and 323 first implantation (FI) patients, who underwent transvaginal ultrasound before FET. We collected basic clinical data and multimodal ultrasound data from these patients as predictive features, with clinical pregnancy as the predictive label, for model training. Based on the above, this study aims to establish and validate a clinical prediction model for FET outcomes using support vector classification (SVC) algorithms, based on MV-FLOW™ and multidimensional transvaginal ultrasound imaging features. The objective is to determine the predictive role of multimodal transvaginal ultrasound in embryo transfer outcomes and provide evidence for the clinical application of MV-FLOW™. Trial registration: Trial Registration: ChiCTR2400086401.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NO authors have competing interests Enter: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study flow chart.
Note: FI, first implantation; RIF, Recurrent implantation failure; ET, embryo transfer.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The schedule of enrolment, interventions, and assessments.
Note: *-t1: Eligibility screen and informed consent before frozen embryo transfer; 0: Allocation at the beginning of frozen embryo; t1: Ultrasound analysis at the day before embryo transfer; t2: Biochemical pregnancy at 14 days following embryo transfer; t3: Clinical pregnancy and embryo implantation at 28 days after embryo transfer.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ata B, Kalafat E, Somigliana E. A new definition of recurrent implantation failure on the basis of anticipated blastocyst aneuploidy rates across female age. Fertility and sterility. 2021;116(5):1320–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.06.045 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaulov T, Sierra S, Sylvestre C. Recurrent implantation failure in IVF: A Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Reproductive biomedicine online. 2020;41(5):819–33. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Franasiak JM, Alecsandru D, Forman EJ, Gemmell LC, Goldberg JM, Llarena N, et al.. A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure. Fertility and sterility. 2021;116(6):1436–48. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pirtea P, De Ziegler D, Tao X, Sun L, Zhan Y, Ayoubi JM, et al.. Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers. Fertility and sterility. 2021;115(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mercan R. Does the new definition of recurrent implantation failure have clinical relevance? Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2024. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae095 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources