Bone Loss and Soft Tissue Loss Following Orthodontic Extraction Using Conventional Forceps versus Physics Forceps: A Prospective Split Mouth Study
- PMID: 39902417
- PMCID: PMC11787130
- DOI: 10.1007/s12663-024-02165-w
Bone Loss and Soft Tissue Loss Following Orthodontic Extraction Using Conventional Forceps versus Physics Forceps: A Prospective Split Mouth Study
Abstract
Introduction: Extraction of teeth has been a staple procedure performed by the dental fraternity since ages. Often considered traumatic, tooth extraction causes immediate destruction of the bone and soft tissue envelop surrounding the extracted teeth. Periodontal structure integrity is of paramount importance especially when atraumatic orthodontic extractions are indicated. With newer instruments being developed for the extraction atrumatic extractions are possible while respecting all the paradental tissues.
Aim: The study aims to compare and highlight the effective atraumatic extraction performed by the physics forceps as compared to the conventional forceps.
Materials and methods: The groups were split between Conventional forceps (Group A) and Physics forceps (Group B) and a total of 80 teeth (Group A = 40 and Group B = 40) were extracted. The teeth selected to be extracted were standardized as the bilateral first premolar as advised by the orthodontist as a method of space gaining. The time taken for extraction, the complications faced, the post-operative bone and soft tissue loss were measured.
Result: The intraoperative complications were sporadic but were statistically not significant. The time taken for extraction using physics forceps was significantly lesser compared to the conventional forceps group (p = 0.000). The post-operative bone and soft tissue loss was significantly lesser in the physic forceps group as compared to the conventional forceps group (p = 0.000).
Conclusion: Physics forceps emerged more time effective in extraction of teeth with minimal damage to the surrounding periodontium.
Keywords: Atraumatic extraction; Bone loss; Gingiva loss; Orthodontic extraction; Physics forceps.
© The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Caplanis N, Lozada JL, Kan JY (2005) Extraction defect: assessment, classification and management. J Calif Dent Assoc 33(11):853–863 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources