Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Feb 4:8:e64033.
doi: 10.2196/64033.

Association of Subjective Cognitive Concerns With Performance on Mobile App-Based Cognitive Assessment in Cognitively Normal Older Adults: Observational Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Association of Subjective Cognitive Concerns With Performance on Mobile App-Based Cognitive Assessment in Cognitively Normal Older Adults: Observational Study

Caroline O Nester et al. JMIR Aging. .

Abstract

Background: Subjective cognitive concerns (SCCs) may be among the earliest clinical symptoms of dementia. There is growing interest in applying a mobile app-based cognitive assessment to remotely screen for cognitive status in preclinical dementia, but the relationship between SCC and relevant mobile assessment metrics is uncertain.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the relationship between SCC and adherence, satisfaction, and performance on mobile app assessments in cognitively unimpaired older adults.

Methods: Participants (N=122; Meanage=68.85 [SD 4.93] years; Meaneducation=16.85 [SD 2.39] years; female: n=82, 66.7%; White:n=106, 86.2%) completed 8 assessment days using Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change (M2C2), an app-based testing platform, with brief daily sessions within morning, afternoon, and evening time windows (24 total testing sessions). M2C2 includes digital working memory, processing speed, and episodic memory tasks. Participants provided feedback about their satisfaction and motivation related to M2C2 upon study completion. SCC was assessed using the Cognitive Function Instrument. Regression analyses evaluated the association between SCC and adherence, satisfaction, and performance on M2C2, controlling for age, sex, depression, and loneliness. Linear-mixed effects models evaluated whether SCC predicted M2C2 subtest performance over the 8-day testing period, controlling for covariates.

Results: SCC was not associated with app satisfaction or protocol motivation, but it was significantly associated with lower rates of protocol adherence (ß=-.20, P=.37, 95% CI -.65 to -.02). Higher SCC endorsement significantly predicted worse overall episodic memory performance (ß=-.20, P=.02, 95% CI -.02 to -.01), but not working memory or processing speed. There was a main effect of SCC on working memory performance at day 1 (estimate=-1.05, SE=0.47, P=.03) and a significant interaction between SCC and working memory over the 8-day period (estimate=0.05, SE=0.02, P=.03), such that SCC was associated with initially worse, then progressively better working memory performance.

Conclusions: SCCs are associated with worse overall memory performance on mobile app assessments, patterns of cognitive inefficiency (variable working memory), and mildly diminished adherence across an 8-day assessment period. Findings suggest that mobile app assessments may be sensitive to subtle cognitive changes, with important implications for early detection and treatment for individuals at risk for dementia.

Keywords: Cognitive Function Instrument; MCI; aging; app-based; applications; assessment; cognition; digital cognitive assessment; digital health; elderly; geriatrics; gerontology; mHealth; memory; mild cognitive impairment; mobile app; mobile health; mobile monitoring of cognitive change; mobile phone; older adult; preclinical Alzheimer disease; preclinical dementia; remote; subjective cognitive concerns; subjective cognitive decline.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: KDH is an employee of Cogstate Ltd. All remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Study procedures. UCLA: University of California, Los Angeles.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change (M2C2) app subtests.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Subjective cognitive concerns association with working memory longitudinally over the 8-day mobile-appmobile app protocoll. CFI: Cognitive Function Instrument.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, et al. A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Dement. 2014 Nov;10(6):844–852. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, Buckley RF, et al. The characterisation of subjective cognitive decline. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Mar;19(3):271–278. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30368-0. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rabin LA, Smart CM, Amariglio RE. Subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:369–396. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045136. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang XT, Wang ZT, Hu HY, et al. Association of subjective cognitive decline with risk of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective longitudinal studies. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(3):277–285. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2021.27. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parfenov VA, Zakharov VV, Kabaeva AR, Vakhnina NV. Subjective cognitive decline as a predictor of future cognitive decline: a systematic review. Dem Neuropsychol. 2020;14(3):248–257. doi: 10.1590/1980-57642020dn14-030007. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types