Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;35(3):715-724.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07715-w. Epub 2025 Feb 4.

New Insights into Ruling Out Internal Herniations After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass on the Abdominal CT Scan: The OPERATE study

Affiliations

New Insights into Ruling Out Internal Herniations After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass on the Abdominal CT Scan: The OPERATE study

Marjolein R A Vink et al. Obes Surg. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Internal herniation (IH) is a potentially life-threatening complication after gastric bypass. Accurate diagnosis of IH remains challenging. This study aims to validate the Eindhoven2020 (EHV20) scoring system for ruling out IH and seeks to improve its diagnostic accuracy through additional radiologic parameters.

Methods: Patients participating in a prospective study on abdominal pain after gastric bypass surgery were selected if a CT scan was performed. CT scans were scored following the EHV20 scoring system containing ten signs of IH to confirm the individual and collective accuracy of these signs. Also, we evaluated the diagnostic value of additional radiologic parameters: delayed passage of contrast, dilated intestinal loops, and free fluid.

Results: A total of 375 patients with abdominal pain were included. IH was confirmed during laparoscopy in 27 patients. On CT, the highest sensitivity was achieved by the swirl sign (66.7%) and the highest specificity by a small bowel behind the superior mesenteric artery (99.7%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on the EHV20 scoring system for ruling out IH was 0.845 (95% CI 0.730-0.959). The AUC could be improved to 0.905 (95% CI 0.825-0.985) (p = 0.088) through the incorporation of several additional signs. Overall, this new scoring system included swirl sign, small bowel obstruction, enlarged nodes, venous congestion, mesenteric edema, dilated alimentary or biliary loop, free fluid, and backward flow in the biliary loop with possible backflow in the residual stomach.

Conclusions: Incorporation of additional CT signs into an existing scoring system can help clinicians to safely rule out IH in patients with abdominal pain after bariatric surgery.

Keywords: Computed tomography; Internal herniation; Radiological signs; Standardized protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
An example of a swirl sign and mesenteric edema in one patient from cranial to caudal, b a rotation that starts after the vena mesenteric superior from cranial to caudal which is typical for a hurricane eye sign, and c a herniated root via a surgical defect between the superior mesenteric artery and the distal mesenteric arterial branch with crowding and stretching of the mesentery from cranial to caudal which is typical for a mushroom sign
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow diagram for the patient inclusion for this study. *Excluded because of double episodes or consecutive CT scans in one episode. **Surgical findings: 1 × intussusception, 1 × necrotic cholecystitis, 1 × jejunal stenosis, 1 × gastrojejunal stenosis, 4 × adhesive small bowel obstruction, 1 × perforated gastrojejunal anastomosis perforation, 11 × no abnormalities found. IH, internal herniation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic curves for clinical signs predicting internal herniation after bariatric surgery. AUC, area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of the EHV20 model and the final model

Similar articles

References

    1. Ederveen JC, Nienhuijs SW, Jol S, et al. Structured CT reporting improves accuracy in diagnosing internal herniation after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(6):3448–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farukhi MA, Mattingly MS, Clapp B, et al. 2017 CT scan reliability in detecting internal hernia after gastric bypass. JSLS J Soc Laparoendoscopic Surg 21(4) - PMC - PubMed
    1. Iannuccilli JD, Grand D, Murphy BL, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of eight CT signs in the preoperative diagnosis of internal mesenteric hernia following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Clin Radiol. 2009;64(4):373–80. - PubMed
    1. Lockhart ME, Tessler FN, Canon CL, et al. Internal hernia after gastric bypass: sensitivity and specificity of seven CT signs with surgical correlation and controls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(3):745–50. - PubMed
    1. Gormsen J, Burcharth J, Gogenur I, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for chronic abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: a cohort study. Ann Surg. 2021;273(2):306–14. - PubMed

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources