Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr:242:116228.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116228. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

Overcoming inertia: Provider perspectives on de-implementation strategies in preoperative testing

Affiliations

Overcoming inertia: Provider perspectives on de-implementation strategies in preoperative testing

Erin Kim et al. Am J Surg. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Routine preoperative testing for low-risk surgeries is often unnecessary and may result in preventable harm. While de-implementation strategies have reduced the frequency and proportion of unnecessary preoperative tests, the reach of the strategies and the provider-level adoption remain unclear. Understanding stakeholders' perspective on these strategies is essential for widespread de-implementation.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with 18 anesthesiologists, surgeons, and physician assistants at a single academic institution. Thematic analysis was guided by the RE-AIM framework, and persistent barriers were assessed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: De-implementation strategies achieved high reach, with educational meetings emerging as the most effective strategy. Workflow variations significantly influenced adoption and implementation, with regular meetings and data sharing identified as facilitators for maintenance. Barriers were identified in the individual characteristics, inner setting, and outer setting levels.

Conclusions: Tailored de-implementation strategies are essential to overcoming provider- and institution-level barriers and to sustain guideline-concordant care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

References

    1. Balk EM, Earley A, Hadar N, Shah N, Trikalinos TA. Benefits and Harms of Routine Preoperative Testing: Comparative Effectiveness. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014. Accessed April 15, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK184821/ - PubMed
    1. Kirkham KR, Wijeysundera DN, Pendrith C, et al. Preoperative testing before low-risk surgical procedures. CMAJ. 2015;187(11):E349–E358. doi:10.1503/cmaj.150174 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolfson D, Santa J, Slass L. Engaging physicians and consumers in conversations about treatment overuse and waste: a short history of the choosing wisely campaign. Acad Med. 2014;89(7):990–995. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000270 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antunez AG, Telem DA, Dossett LA. Assessment of Surgical Specialty Societies’ Choosing Wisely Recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(10):971–973. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baskin AS, Wang T, Berlin NL, Skolarus TA, Dossett LA. Scope and Characteristics of Choosing Wisely in Cancer Care Recommendations by Professional Societies. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(9):1463–1465. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.2066 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources