The effect of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
- PMID: 39904905
- PMCID: PMC11794363
- DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09212-3
The effect of non-pharmacological interventions on cognitive function in cancer: an overview of systematic reviews
Abstract
Purpose: A significant number of cancer survivors experience cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), which can impact their ability to think, reason, make decisions, and perform daily actions. In recent years, non-pharmacological interventions for CRCI have gained significant attention. These interventions include exercise, cognitive behavioural therapy, cognitive training/remediation, dietary, mind-body, and multi-modal/complex interventions. This umbrella review provides a critical overview to inform guidelines and current practice, identify the most promising interventions, and uncover gaps in the research literature.
Methods: This umbrella review of systematic reviews was pre-registered on Open Science Framework and PROSPERO. Six databases were searched. Systematic reviews (SR) assessing any non-pharmacological interventions to improve cognition in cancer (any type) were included. The overview followed gold-standard guidelines and recommendations. The results were narratively synthesised, and descriptive statistics and effect size ranges were calculated.
Results: Sixty-four (n = 64) SRs were included. Results were synthesised into four non-pharmacological domains. Cognitive training/rehabilitation had the strongest evidence for efficacy. Physical activity/exercise showed promising efficacy; however, the variability of findings was considerable. Mind-body and psychological/behavioural therapy interventions were limited, but there was evidence for short-term effectiveness. Multi-modal/complex interventions showed potential for improving cognition in cancer but were poorly defined.
Conclusions: Overall, non-pharmacological interventions demonstrated efficacy for improving cognition in cancer. There were limited intervention characteristics within domains which were consistently related to efficacy. Three key recommendations are provided for future research: (1) adopt harmonisation and reporting guidelines; (2) develop definitional guidelines of cognitive domains for CRCI research; and (3) assess intervention and participant characteristics associated with positive versus null/negative findings.
Keywords: Cancer; Cancer-related cognitive impairment; Cognition; Cognitive rehabilitation; Exercise; Intervention; Non-pharmacological.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: Not Applicable. Consent to participate: Not Applicable. Consent for publication: Not Applicable. Competing interests: This project was completed within a MASCC Cognition Fellowship. NHH is an Associate Editor of the Supportive Care in Cancer journal. DH is a MASCC Cognition Fellow; NHH is Chair of MASCC Fatigue and MASCC Exercise Oncology; NHH is a MASCC Terry Langbaum Survivorship Fellow; AC is the MASCC President-Elect; RJC is MASCC Treasurer; MBL is MASCC Immediate Past President.
References
-
- Binarelli G et al (2023) Cancer-related cognitive impairment: current perspectives on the management of cognitive changes following cancer treatment. Expert Rev Neurother 23(3):249–268 - PubMed
-
- Mayo SJ et al (2021) Cancer-related cognitive impairment in patients with non-central nervous system malignancies: an overview for oncology providers from the MASCC Neurological Complications Study Group. Support Care Cancer 29:2821–2840 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
