Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;12(3):1818-1831.
doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15187. Epub 2025 Feb 4.

Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus

Affiliations

Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus

Cristiana Vitale et al. ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Aims: The Heart Failure Frailty Score (HFFS) is a novel, multidimensional tool to assess frailty in patients with heart failure (HF). It has been developed to overcome limitations of existing frailty assessment tools while being practical for clinical use. The HFFS reflects the concept of frailty as a multidimensional, dynamic and potentially reversible state, which increases vulnerability to stressors and risk of poor outcomes in patients with HF.

Methods and results: The HFFS was developed through a Delphi consensus process involving 54 international experts. This approach involved iterative rounds of questionnaires and interviews, where a panel of experts provided their opinions on specific questions prepared by the Steering Committee. The experts were invited to vote and share their views anonymously, using a 5-point Likert scale over iterative rounds. An 80% threshold was set for agreement or disagreement for each statement. Twenty-two variables from four domains (clinical, functional, psycho-cognitive and social) have been selected for inclusion in the HFFS after the third round of the Delphi process. A shorter version (S-HFFS), including 10 variables, has also been developed for daily clinical use.

Conclusions: The HFFS is a new multidimensional tool for the identification of frailty in patients with HF. It should also enables healthcare providers to identify potential 'red flags' for frailty in order to develop personalized care plans. The next step will be to validate the new score in patients with HF.

Keywords: Frailty; Heart failure; Management; Prognosis; Score.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

S. Anker reports grants and personal fees from CSL Vifor, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Servier, grants and personal fees from Abbott Vascular, personal fees from Cardiac Dimensions, personal fees from Actimed Therapeutics, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Amgen, personal fees from Bioventrix, personal fees from V‐Wave, personal fees from Brahms, personal fees from Cordio, personal fees from Occlutech, personal fees from Cardior, personal fees from CVRx, personal fees from Cytokinetics, personal fees from Edwards, personal fees from Farraday Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from HeartKinetics, personal fees from Impulse Dynamics, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Repairon, personal fees from Medical Sensible, personal fees from Vectorious, from V‐Wave, outside the submitted work; and Dr. Anker is named co‐inventor of two patent applications regarding MR‐proANP (DE 102007010834 & DE 102007022367), but he does not benefit personally from the related issued patents. B. Bozkurt reports consulting for Abbott, Abiomed, American Regent, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Liva Nova, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Regeneron, Respicardia/Zoll, Roche, Sanofi‐Aventis, Vifor. P. Brooks reports honoraria from AstraZeneca. R. Ferrari reports personal fees from Servier International, Merck Serono, Lupin, Boehringer, Astrazeneca, Sunpharma, outside the submitted work. F. Gustafsson reports grants and personal fees from Abbott, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Pharmacosmos, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Ionis, personal fees from Alnylam, outside the submitted work. L Hill reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, personal fees from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Y. Matsue reports personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., personal fees from Novartis Pharma K.K., personal fees from Bayer Inc., personal fees from AstraZeneca, grants from Pfizer Japan Inc., grants from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., grants from EN Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. G. Rosano reports grants from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Anlylam, grants from Boheringer Ingelheim, grants from CSL Vifor, other from Menarini, other from Servier, personal fees from Cipla, grants from Medtronic, outside the submitted work. GR work was supported by funding of the Italian Ministry of Health [Ricerca corrente 20/1819]. Dr. Theou reports that he has asserted copyright of the Pictorial Fit‐Frail Scale, which is made freely available for education, research and not‐for‐profit health care. Licences for commercial use are facilitated through the Dalhousie Office of Commercialization and Industry Engagement. O. Tkaczyszyn reports personal fees (for the sub‐investigation in clinical trials) from Takeda, Impulse Dynamics, Cytokinetics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Eidos Therapeutics and V‐Wave Ltd., outside the submitted work. H. Tsutsui reports personal fees from Novartis Pharma K.K., personal fees from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., personal fees from Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., personal fees from Pfizer Japan Inc., and Honoraria from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. The other co‐authors have nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Main phases of the Delphi process. HFFS, Heart Failure Frailty Score; S‐HFFS, Short Heart Failure Frailty Score.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Heart Failure Frailty Score. ADLs, activities of daily living; AMT4, Abbreviated Mini Mental Test; CV, cardiovascular.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Short Heart Failure Frailty Score. ADLs, activities of daily living; AMT4, Abbreviated Mini Mental Test; CV, cardiovascular; 30‐sec CT, 30‐s chair stand test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Negative effects of social isolation. Social isolation can cause multifactorial negative consequences thus increasing the risk of frailty.

References

    1. Denfeld QE, Winters‐Stone K, Mudd JO, Gelow JM, Kurdi S, Lee CS. The prevalence of frailty in heart failure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Cardiol 2017;236:283‐289. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.153 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang Y, Yuan M, Gong M, Tse G, Li G, Liu T. Frailty and clinical outcomes in heart failure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018;19:1003‐1008. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.06.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McNallan SM, Singh M, Chamberlain AM, Kane RL, Dunlay SM, Redfield MM, et al. Frailty and healthcare utilization among patients with heart failure in the community. JACC Heart Fail. 2013;1:135‐141. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2013.01.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Lupón J, Vidán MT, Ferguson C, Gastelurrutia P, Newton PJ, et al. Impact of frailty on mortality and hospitalization in chronic heart failure: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008251. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.008251 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Talha KM, Pandey A, Fudim M, Butler J, Anker SD, Khan MS. Frailty and heart failure: state‐of‐the‐art review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2023;14:1959‐1972. doi:10.1002/jcsm.13306 - DOI - PMC - PubMed