Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 21:7:1499333.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1499333. eCollection 2025.

Integrating general practitioners' and patients' perspectives in the development of a digital tool supporting primary care for older patients with multimorbidity: a focus group study

Affiliations

Integrating general practitioners' and patients' perspectives in the development of a digital tool supporting primary care for older patients with multimorbidity: a focus group study

Ingmar Schäfer et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: The web application gp-multitool.de is based on the German clinical practice guideline "multimorbidity" and supports mutual prioritisation of treatments by GPs (general practitioners) and patients. The application facilitates sending hyperlinks to standardized assessments by email, which can be completed by patients on any suitable digital device. GPs can document clinical decisions. The tool also supports a structured medication review. Aims of this study were to consider needs and wants of the target groups in implementing the "multimorbidity" clinical practice guideline in a digital tool, and to examine themes of discussions in order to identify which aspects were considered most important for customising a digital tool.

Materials and methods: We conducted six focus groups with 32 GPs and six focus groups with 33 patients. Eight groups were conducted alongside the programming of the web application and four after finishing a prototype. GPs were recruited by mail and asked to invite up to six eligible patients from their practice to participate. Focus groups were based on semi-structured interview guides and discussed assessments, functionalities, usability and reliability of gp-multitool.de. Discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed using content analysis.

Results: GPs wanted to avoid unnecessary and time-consuming functions and did not want to explore problems that they could not provide solutions for. For some assessments, GPs suggested simplifying scales or including residual categories. GPs and patients also addressed possible misunderstandings due to wording and discussed if some items might be too intimate or overtax patients intellectually. In most cases, participants confirmed usability, but they suggested changes in default settings and pointed out a few minor bugs that needed to be fixed. While some GPs considered data security an important topic, most patients were unconcerned with this issue and open to share their data.

Conclusion: Our study indicates that focus groups can be used to customize a digital tool according to the needs and wants of target groups and thus, improve content, functionality, usability, and reliability of digital tools. However, digital tools still need to be piloted and evaluated in everyday care. In our focus groups, study participants confirmed that gp-multitool.de can be a relevant approach for overcoming deficits in the information needed for mutual prioritisation of treatments by GPs and patients.

Keywords: chronic diseases; clinical practice guidelines; digitalisation; multimorbidity; shared decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MS, DL and IS are co-authors of the clinical practice guideline “multimorbidity” of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sitemap of gp-multitool.de. CPG, clinical practice guideline; DEGAM, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin; PDF, adobe portable document format.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshots of patient assessments on mobile devices. Image © Janis Vernier 2022.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screenshot of GPs’ management of assessments.

References

    1. Violan C, Foguet-Boreu Q, Flores-Mateo G, Salisbury C, Blom J, Freitag M, et al. Prevalence, determinants and patterns of multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One. (2014) 9:e102149. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102149 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu X, Mishra GD, Jones M. Evidence on multimorbidity from definition to intervention: an overview of systematic reviews. Ageing Res Rev. (2017) 37:53–68. 10.1016/j.arr.2017.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev. (2011) 10:430–9. 10.1016/j.arr.2011.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tinetti ME, Fried TR, Boyd CM. Designing health care for the most common chronic condition–multimorbidity. JAMA. (2012) 307:2493–4. Erratum in: JAMA. 2012;308:238. 10.1001/jama.2012.5265 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallace E, Salisbury C, Guthrie B, Lewis C, Fahey T, Smith SM. Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care. BMJ. (2015) 350:h176. 10.1136/bmj.h176 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources