Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms
- PMID: 39907172
- PMCID: PMC11795279
- DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3654
Pre-stimulus activities affect subsequent visual processing: Empirical evidence and potential neural mechanisms
Abstract
Purpose: Humans obtain most of their information from visual stimuli. The perception of these stimuli may be modulated by the ongoing pre-stimulus brain activities. Depending on the task design, the processing of different cognitive functions such as spatial attention, feature-based attention, temporal attention, arousal, and mental imagery may start prior to the stimulus onset.
Method: This process is typically accompanied by changes in pre-stimulus oscillatory activities including power, phase, or connectivity in different frequency bands. To explain the effect of these changes, several mechanisms have been proposed. In this article, we review these changes and the potential mechanisms in the context of the pre-stimulus enabled cognitive functions. We provide evidence both in favor of and against the most documented mechanisms and conclude that no single mechanism can solely delineate the effects of pre-stimulus brain activities on later processing. Instead, multiple mechanisms may work in tandem to guide pre-stimulus brain activities.
Finding: Additionally, our findings indicate that in many studies a combination of these cognitive functions begins prior to stimulus onset.
Conclusion: Thus, dissociating these cognitive functions is challenging based on the current literature, and the need for precise task designs in later studies to differentiate between them is crucial.
Keywords: arousal; brain oscillations; cognitive functions; feature‐based attention; mental imagery; pre‐stimulus activities; spatial attention; temporal attention.
© 2025 The Author(s). Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Detecting Unattended Stimuli Depends on the Phase of Prestimulus Neural Oscillations.J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 21;38(12):3092-3101. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3006-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 19. J Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 29459372 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus-Driven Brain Rhythms within the Alpha Band: The Attentional-Modulation Conundrum.J Neurosci. 2019 Apr 17;39(16):3119-3129. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1633-18.2019. Epub 2019 Feb 15. J Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30770401 Free PMC article.
-
Attention Periodically Binds Visual Features As Single Events Depending on Neural Oscillations Phase-Locked to Action.J Neurosci. 2019 May 22;39(21):4153-4161. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2494-18.2019. Epub 2019 Mar 18. J Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 30886011 Free PMC article.
-
Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Sep;13(9):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.06.003. Epub 2009 Aug 27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009. PMID: 19716752 Review.
-
Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.Trends Neurosci. 2018 Nov;41(11):789-805. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jul 31. Trends Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30075867 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Antonov, P. A. , Chakravarthi, R. , & Andersen, S. K. (2020). Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention. Neuroimage, 219, 117006. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources