Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14508.
doi: 10.1002/alz.14508. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

The Alzheimer's Association Global Biomarker Standardization Consortium (GBSC) plasma phospho-tau Round Robin study

Affiliations

The Alzheimer's Association Global Biomarker Standardization Consortium (GBSC) plasma phospho-tau Round Robin study

Nicholas J Ashton et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: The Alzheimer's Association Global Biomarker Standardization Consortium conducted a blinded case-control study to learn which phosphorylated tau (p-tau) assays provide the largest fold-changes in Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus non-AD and show commutability in measuring patient samples and candidate certified reference materials (CRMs).

Methods: Thirty-three different p-tau assays measured paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from 40 participants (25 with "AD pathology" and 15 with "non-AD pathology" by CSF amyloid beta [Aβ]42/Aβ40 and p-tau181 criteria). Four CRMs were assessed.

Results: Plasma p-tau217 demonstrated higher fold-changes between AD and non-AD than other p-tau epitopes. Fujirebio LUMIPULSE G, UGOT IPMS, and Lilly MSD p-tau217 provided the highest fold-changes. Plasma p-tau217 showed the strongest correlations between plasma assays (rho = 0.81-0.97). The CRMs were not commutable across assays.

Discussion: Plasma p-tau217 showed larger fold-changes and better accuracy for detecting AD pathology in symptomatic individuals, with greater cross-platform agreement than other p-tau variants. Further work is needed to develop suitable CRMs facilitating cross-assay standardization.

Highlights: Paired plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from twenty-five Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 15 non-AD patients were measured blind. Thirty-three plasma assays were compared, for phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181), 205, 212, 217 and 231. Plasma p-tau217 consistently had the highest fold-change and was best correlated between assays. Plasma-CSF correlations were weak to moderate. There was lack of commutability for four candidate reference materials.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; candidate reference materials; cerebrospinal fluid; commutability; immunoassay; phosphorylated tau; plasma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All biomarker measurements were performed by the assay developers in‐house without cost. ALZpath p‐tau217 was performed at the University of Gothenburg (UGOT) and Lilly immunoassays were performed at the University of Lund. C2N Diagnostics declined to participate in the study. N.J.A. has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Eli‐Lilly, Roche Diagnostics, Alamar Biosciences, Biogen, VJDementia and Quanterix; consulted for Quanterix, TauRx, Neurogen Biomarking; served on advisory boards for Biogen, TauRx, and TargetALS; and has a pending patent application (PCT/US2024/037834 (WSGR Docket No. 58484‐709.601): Methods for Remote Blood Collection, Extraction and Analysis of Neuro Biomarkers). A.K., W.S.B., U.A., and B.A. have no conflicts of interest. M.D. is an employee of AbbVie and holds stock or stock options. S.B. is an employee of AbbVie and holds stock or stock options. J.V. is an employee of ADx NeuroSciences. C.L. is an employee of ADx NeuroSciences. M.V.L. is an employee of ADx NeuroSciences. E.S. is an employee of ADx NeuroSciences. S.I. is an employee of Alamar Biosciences. H.Y.J. is an employee of Alamar Biosciences. X.X. is an employee of Alamar Biosciences. A.F‐H. is an employee of Alamar Biosciences. B.Z. is an employee of, and has stock or stock options in, Alamar Biosciences. Y.L. is an employee of Alamar Biosciences. A.J. is former employee of ALZpath, Inc., and has stock in ALZpath, Inc., and Quanterix, Inc. M.V. is an employee of Fujirebio Europe N.V. N.L.B. is an employee of Fujirebio Europe N.V. H.K. is a former employee of Johnson and Johnson, and a current employee of the Enigma Biomedical Group; has undertaken paid consultancy for AviadoBio and Alector; has received an honorarium from Fortrea; and has a pending patient application for the Janssen CSF ptau217+ assay. D.B. has no conflicts of interest. G.T‐B. is an employee of Janssen R&D and has stock options; there is a pending patent application for the Janssen Simoa plasma p‐tau217+ assay. D.B. and S.J. have no conflicts of interest. S‐Y.Y. is an employee of MagQu Co., Ltd. C.D. is an employee of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. D.R. is an employee of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. G.S. is an employee of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. J.W. is an employee of Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC. K.M. is an employee of Quanterix. M.K. is an employee of Quanterix. A.J. is a full‐time employee of, and has stock or stock options in, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany. L.S. is a full‐time employee of, and has stock or stock options in, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany. J.G., P.R.K., F.G.‐O., and L.M.‐G. have no conflicts of interest. O.H. has acquired research support (for the institution) from C2N Diagnostics. In the past 2 years, he has received consultancy/speaker fees from AC Immune, BioArctic, Biogen, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Fujirebio, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, and Siemens. R.A.R. has received consulting fees from Amydis Inc., Bioivt, Lexeo, Keystone Bio, Allyx, DiamiR, and PrecisionMed; and support for travel from Biogen. M.C.C. has no conflicts of interest. L.M.S. has served as a consultant or on advisory boards for Biogen, Roche Diagnostics, and Fujirebio; and receives in‐kind support from Fujirebio and Roche Diagnostics automated immunoassay platforms and reagents. K.B. has served as a consultant, on advisory boards, or on data monitoring committees for Abcam, Axon, BioArctic, Biogen, JOMDD/Shimadzu, Julius Clinical, Lilly, MagQu, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pharmatrophix, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers; and is a cofounder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program, outside the work presented in this paper. J.M.S. has received research funding from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals (a wholly owned subsidiary of Eli Lilly); consulted for Roche Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Merck, and Eli Lilly; given educational lectures sponsored by GE Healthcare, Eli Lilly, and Biogen; and is Chief Medical Officer for ARUK. H.Z. has served on scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZPath, Amylyx, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Merry Life, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave; has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Alzecure, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Lilly, and Roche; and is a co‐founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS), which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program (outside submitted work). COBAS and ELECSYS are trademarks of Roche. All other trademarks are the8 property of their respective owners. The Elecsys Phospho‐Tau (181P) CSF immunoassay is approved for clinical use. The Elecsys p‐Tau181 and p‐Tau217 prototype plasma immunoassays are not currently approved for clinical use or commercially available. Author disclosures are available in the Supporting Information.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Median fold‐change of plasma and CSF p‐tau biomarkers in the AD versus non‐AD group. Forest plots indicate the median fold‐change of plasma (A) and CSF (B) p‐tau variants in the AD pathology group compared with the non‐AD pathology group. Bars correspond to standard error. Table S4 and Table S5 numerically describe this plot. AD, Alzheimer's disease; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IMR, immunomagnetic reduction; IPMS, immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry; MSD, MesoScale Discovery; NULISA, NUcleic acid Linked Immunosorbent Assay; p‐tau, phosphorylated tau; Simoa, single‐molecule arrray; UGOT, University of Gothenburg.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Correlations between all plasma p‐tau217 assays. Scatterplots represent the continuous associations between all plasma p‐tau217 assays. The dots indicate biomarker concentration and the solid black line indicates the mean regression line. In each panel, the text indicates the computed Passing–Bablok equation for each assay pair and Spearman's rho (ρ) alongside its level of statistical significance in brackets. Units are pg/mL for all assays excepting NULISA, which provides relative quantification in NPQ (NULISA Protein Quantification) units; IPMS, which is measured in fmol/L; and IPMS ratio, which has no units. ns, not significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001. IPMS, immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry; MSD, MesoScale Discovery; NULISA, NUcleic acid Linked Immunosorbent Assay; p‐tau217, tau phosphorylated at threonine 217; Simoa, single‐molecule array; UGOT, University of Gothenburg.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Correlations between all plasma p‐tau181 assays. Scatterplots represent the continuous associations between all plasma p‐tau181 assays. The dots indicate biomarker concentration and the solid black line indicates the mean regression line. In each panel, the text indicates the computed Passing–Bablok equation for each assay pair and Spearman's rho (ρ) alongside its associated level of statistical significance in brackets. Units are pg/mL for all assays except NULISA, which provides relative quantification in NPQ (NULISA Protein Quantification) units; IPMS, which is measured in fmol/L; and IPMS ratio, which has no units. ns, not significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001. IMR, immunomagnetic reduction; IPMS, immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry; MSD, MesoScale Discovery; NULISA, NUcleic acid Linked Immunosorbent Assay; p‐tau181, tau phosphorylated at threonine 181; Simoa, single‐molecule array; UGOT, University of Gothenburg.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Correlations between all plasma p‐tau231 assays. Scatterplots represent the continuous associations between all plasma p‐tau231 assays. The dots indicate biomarker concentration and the solid black line indicates the mean regression line. In each panel, the text indicates the computed Passing–Bablok equation for each assay pair and Spearman's rho (ρ) alongside its level of statistical significance in brackets. Units are pg/mL for all assays except NULISA, which provides relative quantification in NPQ (NULISA Protein Quantification) units; IPMS, which is measured in fmol/L; and IPMS ratio, which has no units. ns, not significant. *p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001. IPMS, immunoprecipitation‐mass spectrometry; MSD, MesoScale Discovery; NULISA, Nucleic acid LInked Immunosorbent Assay; p‐tau231, tau phosphorylated at threonine 231; Simoa, single‐molecule array; UGOT, University of Gothenburg.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Intra‐assay correlations between plasma and CSF p‐tau217 biomarkers. Scatterplots represent the associations between biomarker measurements performed with the same assay in plasma (y‐axis) and CSF (x‐axis), alongside the mean regression line with 95% confidence intervals, computed based on data from all the participants in the cohort. Red dots indicate participants from the AD group and blue dots indicate participants from the non‐AD group, as defined per clinical evaluation and CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 status. In each panel, the text in black indicates the Spearman's correlation coefficient for the entire cohort and associated p‐value, with red text indicating the Spearman's correlation coefficient and associated p‐value for the AD group only. Units are pg/mL for all assays except NULISA, which provides relative quantification in NPQ (NULISA Protein Quantification) units. AD, Alzheimer's disease; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; MSD, MesoScale Discovery; NULISA, NUcleic acid Linked Immunosorbent Assay, p‐tau217, tau phosphorylated at threonine 217; Simoa, single‐molecule array; UGOT, University of Gothenburg.

Update of

References

    1. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA‐AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535‐562. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hansson O. Biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Med. 2021;27(6):954‐963. - PubMed
    1. Rissman RA, Langford O, Raman R, et al . Plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 and phospho‐tau217 concentration ratios increase the accuracy of amyloid PET classification in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(2):1214‐1224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schindler SE, Bollinger JG, Ovod V, et al. High‐precision plasma beta‐amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis. Neurology. 2019;93(17):e1647‐e59. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakamura A, Kaneko N, Villemagne VL, et al. High performance plasma amyloid‐beta biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Nature. 2018;554(7691):249‐254. - PubMed

Grants and funding