Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 1;111(4):2766-2772.
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002145.

International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation: The RAPID Consensus ISLS 2023 Zurich Collaborative

No authors listed

International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation: The RAPID Consensus ISLS 2023 Zurich Collaborative

No authors listed. Int J Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Since its beginning in 1963, liver transplantation has significantly advanced, now including transplant oncology. As indications broaden, donor supply reduces. The two-stage RAPID procedure (initially abbreviated as "Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy") has emerged to address the use of small-for-size grafts. However, a comprehensive evaluation of RAPID is essential given its novelty, scarcity, and diverse outcomes reported.

Methods: The RAPID Consensus International Society of Liver Surgeons 2023 Zurich initiative established evidence around the RAPID procedure using the Danish Model of Consensus. Engaging an international community of specialists, the initiative ensured multidisciplinary involvement and used the GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence and grade the recommendations.

Results: Comprehensive discussions and debates led to internationally recognized recommendations addressing perioperative measures for RAPID. Key recommendations highlighted the significance of standardized nomenclature, specific indications, graft criteria, surgical techniques, optimal interstage timings, and measures to manage potential complications.

Conclusion: The consensus provides recommendations for the RAPID procedure, emphasizing transparency and outcome reporting. Establishing dedicated registries can improve care standards, which may ensure the benefits of RAPID by maximizing patient safety and improving outcomes.

Keywords: Danish model of consensus; GRADE framework; RAPID; international recommendations; liver transplantation; transplant oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

References

    1. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Kaulla KNV, et al. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1963;117:659–76. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lebeck Lee CM, Ziogas IA, Agarwal R, et al. A contemporary systematic review on liver transplantation for unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer. Cancer 2022;128:2243–57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Palaniappan V, Li CH, Frilling A, Clift AK. Long-term outcomes of liver transplantation for the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms: a systematic review. J Pers Med 2023;13:1428. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoti E, Adam R. Liver transplantation for primary and metastatic liver cancers. Transpl Int Off J Eur Soc Organ Transplant 2008;21:1107–17. - PubMed
    1. Hagness M, Foss A, Line PD, et al. Liver transplantation for nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2013;257:800–6. - PubMed

Publication types