International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation: The RAPID Consensus ISLS 2023 Zurich Collaborative
- PMID: 39907624
- PMCID: PMC12175820
- DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002145
International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation: The RAPID Consensus ISLS 2023 Zurich Collaborative
Abstract
Introduction: Since its beginning in 1963, liver transplantation has significantly advanced, now including transplant oncology. As indications broaden, donor supply reduces. The two-stage RAPID procedure (initially abbreviated as "Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy") has emerged to address the use of small-for-size grafts. However, a comprehensive evaluation of RAPID is essential given its novelty, scarcity, and diverse outcomes reported.
Methods: The RAPID Consensus International Society of Liver Surgeons 2023 Zurich initiative established evidence around the RAPID procedure using the Danish Model of Consensus. Engaging an international community of specialists, the initiative ensured multidisciplinary involvement and used the GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence and grade the recommendations.
Results: Comprehensive discussions and debates led to internationally recognized recommendations addressing perioperative measures for RAPID. Key recommendations highlighted the significance of standardized nomenclature, specific indications, graft criteria, surgical techniques, optimal interstage timings, and measures to manage potential complications.
Conclusion: The consensus provides recommendations for the RAPID procedure, emphasizing transparency and outcome reporting. Establishing dedicated registries can improve care standards, which may ensure the benefits of RAPID by maximizing patient safety and improving outcomes.
Keywords: Danish model of consensus; GRADE framework; RAPID; international recommendations; liver transplantation; transplant oncology.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Defining disease severity in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis for the application to biomarker research: an interdisciplinary perspective.Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae080. Br J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38419411 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x. Respir Res. 2024. PMID: 39709425 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Isolated Limb Perfusion Can Avert Amputation Indication in Initially Nonsalvageable Sarcomas of the Extremities.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003584. Online ahead of print. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40536544
-
Prioritizing questions and topics for the development of guidelines and consensus-based recommendations supported by ILAE: A scoping review and proposal of prioritization criteria.Epilepsia. 2025 May;66(5):1406-1416. doi: 10.1111/epi.18286. Epub 2025 Jan 29. Epilepsia. 2025. PMID: 39878760
-
Interventions for cognitive frailty: developing a Delphi consensus with multidisciplinary and multisectoral experts.Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jun 4;17:1541048. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1541048. eCollection 2025. Front Aging Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40535511 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials