Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 5:9:e64444.
doi: 10.2196/64444.

Nurses' Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study

Stefan Walzer  1 , Isabel Schön  2 , Johanna Pfeil  2 , Sam Klemm  3 , Sven Ziegler  3 , Claudia Schmoor  4 , Christophe Kunze  1
Affiliations

Nurses' Perspectives and Experiences of Using a Bed-Exit Information System in an Acute Hospital Setting: Mixed Methods Study

Stefan Walzer et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Technology that detects early when a patient at risk of falling leaves the bed can support nurses in acute care hospitals.

Objective: To develop a better understanding of nurses' perspectives and experiences with a bed-exit information system (BES) in an acute care hospital setting.

Methods: BES was implemented on 3 wards of a university medical center. Nurses completed 2 online surveys at each time point (P0 and P1) and participated in focus groups before (P0) and after (P1) implementation. Additional patient data were collected. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, while content analysis was applied to focus group data. Patient rates and adverse events in both phases were compared using negative binomial models. Reporting of this study adhered to the GRAMMS checklist.

Results: A total of 30 questionnaires were completed at P0 (30/72, 42%) and 24 at P1 (24/71, 33%). Of the participants, 15 completed both questionnaires (complete cases). At P1, 64% (9/14) of participants agreed that their perceived workload and strain in caring for patients with cognitive impairment was reduced by the use of the BES. The adverse event rate per patient per day was reduced by a factor of 0.61 (95% CI 0.393-0.955; P=.03). In addition, 11 nurses participated in 4 focus groups before and after the intervention. Participants found it challenging to operationalize the use of the BES due to the heterogeneity of care settings, but certain behaviors of patients with cognitive impairment were recognized as indicating a need for intervention. Negative experiences included information overload and alarm fatigue, leading to occasional removal of the system.

Conclusions: While BES provides some support in managing patients with cognitive impairment, its impact remains limited to specific scenarios and does not significantly reduce nurses' workload or strain. Our findings highlight the need to manage expectations of BES performance to ensure alignment between expected and actual benefits. To improve BES effectiveness and long-term implementation, future research should consider both objective measures of patient care and subjective factors such as nurse experience, structural conditions, and technical specifications. Improving information mechanisms within call systems could help reduce alarm fatigue and increase perceived usefulness. Overall, successful integration of BES in acute care settings will require close collaboration with nursing staff to drive meaningful healthcare innovation and ensure that the technology meets the needs of both patients and nurses.

Trial registration: German Register for Clinical Studies DRKS00021720; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00021720.

Keywords: acute hospital; bed-exit; cognitive impairment; cognitively impaired; fall prevention; hospital; information system; inpatient; mixed methods; nurse; online questionnaire; support; technology; workload.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Perceived strain (ranging from moderate to very high).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expectations and experiences regarding the use of technology (statements ranging from somewhat agree to strongly agree).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adverse events (type and number).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mudge AM, Lee-Steere K, Treleaven E, Cahill M, Finnigan S, McRae P. Cognitive impairment in older hospital inpatients: prevalence, care needs and carer perceptions. Aust Health Rev. 2022;46(2):244–250. doi: 10.1071/AH20286.AH20286 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fogg C, Griffiths P, Meredith P, Bridges J. Hospital outcomes of older people with cognitive impairment: an integrative review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(9):1177–1197. doi: 10.1002/gps.4919. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29947150 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinkert C, Faul E, Saxer S, Burgstaller M, Kamleitner D, Mayer H. Experiences of nurses with the care of patients with dementia in acute hospitals: a secondary analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1-2):162–172. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13864. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dookhy J, Daly L. Nurses' experiences of caring for persons with dementia experiencing responsive behaviours in an acute hospital: a qualitative descriptive study. Int J Older People Nurs. 2021;16(4):e12379. doi: 10.1111/opn.12379. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Motzek T, Büter K, Mächler K, Junge M, Marquardt G. Orientierungsschwierigkeiten, behaviorale und psychiatrische Symptome bei patienten mit kognitiven Einschränkungen im Krankenhaus. HBScience. 2017;8(2):46–51. doi: 10.1007/s16024-017-0297-8. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources