Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar;12(2):e200379.
doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000200379. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

Fluorescein Angiography as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Susac Syndrome

Affiliations

Fluorescein Angiography as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Susac Syndrome

Laura Guttieres et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity of fluorescein angiography (FA) in detecting disease activity in Susac syndrome.

Methods: We conducted a blinded analysis of all FA, brain MRI, and audiogram examinations performed throughout the follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome.

Results: A total of 79 FA examinations, 85 brain MRI scans, and 49 audiograms were analyzed from 9 patients followed for a mean (SD) period of 6 (4) years. Disease activity was detected in 41.5% of FA examinations, 10.5% of MRI scans, and 25% of audiograms (FA vs MRI, p < 0.0001; FA vs audiogram, p = 0.06; audiogram vs MRI, p < 0.05). Within 3 months of clinical relapses, activity was observed in 57%, 24%, and 27% of FA, MRI, and audiogram examinations, respectively (FA vs MRI, p < 0.05; FA vs audiogram, p = 0.09; audiogram vs MRI, p = 1). Quantitative analysis of FA showed a mean (SD) of 2.5 (2.5) leakages (both eyes) during relapses compared with 1.2 (1.4) during remission (p < 0.05).

Discussion: FA, particularly arterial leakage, demonstrated the highest sensitivity in detecting disease activity and may be a valuable tool for treatment management in Susac syndrome. Future studies with larger samples should aim to identify the optimal threshold of FA changes associated with an increased risk of relapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/NN for full disclosures.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. FA Examination of a Patient's Left Eye Showing Multiple Leakages (Arrow) and BRAOs (Triangle) During an Active Phase of the Disease (A) and Complete Resolution of the Leakages Several Months Later (B)
BRAOs = branch retinal artery occlusions.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Proportion of Examinations Detecting Disease Activity Over Time
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the Total Number of Leakages and BRAOs (Both Eyes) Between the 3-Month Window Surrounding a Clinical Relapse and Outside This Window
BRAOs = branch retinal artery occlusions.

References

    1. Susac JO, Hardman JM, Selhorst JB. Microangiopathy of the brain and retina. Neurology. 1979;29(3):313-316. doi:10.1212/wnl.29.3.313 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Susac JO, Egan RA, Rennebohm RM, Lubow M. Susac's syndrome: 1975-2005 microangiopathy/autoimmune endotheliopathy. J Neurol Sci. 2007;257(1-2):270-272. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.01.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marrodan M, Fiol MP, Correale J. Susac syndrome: challenges in the diagnosis and treatment. Brain. 2022;145(3):858-871. doi:10.1093/brain/awab476 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dörr J, Krautwald S, Wildemann B, et al. . Characteristics of Susac syndrome: a review of all reported cases. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(6):307-316. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.82 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilf-Yarkoni A, Zmira O, Tolkovsky A, et al. . Clinical characterization and ancillary tests in Susac syndrome: a systematic review. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024;11(3):e200209. doi:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200209 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources