Efficacy of a simple intravitreal perfluoropropane injection in treating unclosed idiopathic macular holes following vitrectomy
- PMID: 39910548
- PMCID: PMC11800614
- DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03839-2
Efficacy of a simple intravitreal perfluoropropane injection in treating unclosed idiopathic macular holes following vitrectomy
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a simple intravitreal injection of perfluoropropane (C3F8) in treating unclosed idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) in patients who had previously undergone primary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).
Methods: This study was a retrospective, observational clinical study. It included patients diagnosed with unclosed IMHs following primary PPV combined with internal limiting membrane peeling and air tamponade. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) performed 1 week after PPV revealed unclosed IMHs with the presence of the 'cuff' sign and intraretinal cysts. The following day, these patients received a simple intravitreal C3F8 injection. Comprehensive evaluations, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), indirect ophthalmoscopy, fundus photography, and OCT, were performed before PPV, 1 week after surgery, and at follow-up intervals of 1-3 months after the intravitreal gas injection.
Results: The minimum linear diameter (MLD) of the macular holes (MHs) 1 week before C3F8 injection was 335.1 ± 74.3 μm. Following C3F8 tamponade, the closure rate of the MHs was 100%. The mean BCVA before C3F8 tamponade was 0.68 ± 0.17 logMAR (20/100) after primary PPV, which improved to 0.48 ± 0.19 logMAR (20/63) after C3F8 tamponade, showing a statistically significant difference (P = 0.01).
Conclusions: For patients with unclosed MHs after primary PPV, the presence of the 'cuff' sign on OCT suggests that retreatment can be effectively achieved through a simple intravitreal gas injection. This approach is straightforward, practical, and effective.
Keywords: C3F8; Idiopathic macular hole; Intravitreal gas injection; Long-acting gas perfluoropropane; Pars plana vitrectomy; Primary pars plana vitrectomy; Unclosed idiopathic macular hole.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital (2023KY(L)-25). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


References
-
- Lois N, Burr J, Norrie J, Vale L, Cook J, McDonald A et al. Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling versus No Peeling for Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science. 2011;52:1586. - PubMed
-
- Rahimy E, McCannel CA. Impact of internal limiting membrant peeling on mecular hole reopening: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Retina. 2016;36:679–87. - PubMed
-
- Hejsek L, Dusova J, Stepanov A, Rozsival P. Re-operation of idiopathic macular hole after failed initial surgery. Biomedical Papers. 2014;158:596–9. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous