Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 6:14:e51718.
doi: 10.2196/51718.

Process Evaluations of Interventions for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review

Iklil Iman Mohd Sa'id #  1 , Natasha Hotung #  2 , Madeleine Benton  2 , Iliatha Papachristou Nadal  2 , Anisah Baharom  1 , Matthew Prina  3 , Barakatun Nisak Mohd Yusof  1 , Kimberley Goldsmith  2 , Samantha Birts  4 , Ching Siew Mooi  1 , Angus Forbes  2 , Khalida Ismail  2 , Boon How Chew  1
Affiliations
Review

Process Evaluations of Interventions for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review

Iklil Iman Mohd Sa'id et al. Interact J Med Res. .

Abstract

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is characterized by hyperglycemia in pregnancy and typically resolves after birth. Women with GDM have an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) later in life compared to those with normoglycemic pregnancy. While diabetes prevention interventions (DPIs) have been developed to delay or prevent the onset of T2DM, few studies have provided process evaluation (PE) data to assess the mechanisms of impact, quality of implementation, or contextual factors that may influence the effectiveness of the intervention.

Objective: This study aims to identify and evaluate PE data and how these link to outcomes of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of T2DM prevention interventions for women with GDM.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies published from 2005 to 2020 aiming to capture the most recent DPIs. Five electronic bibliographic databases (Cochrane Library, Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE) were searched to identify relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were published (peer-reviewed) RCTs of DPIs in women with a current diagnosis or history of GDM. Exclusion criteria were studies not published in English; studies where the target population was women who had a family history of T2D or women who were menopausal or postmenopausal; and gray literature, including abstracts in conference proceedings. The Medical Research Council's PE framework of complex interventions was used to identify key PE components. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included studies.

Results: A total of 24 studies were included; however, only 5 studies explicitly reported a PE theoretical framework. The studies involved 3 methods of intervention delivery, including in person (n=7), digital (n=7), and hybrid (n=9). Two of the studies conducted pilot RCTs assessing the feasibility and acceptability of their interventions, including recruitment, participation, retention, program implementation, adherence, and satisfaction, and 1 study assessed the efficacy of a questionnaire to promote food and vegetable intake. While most studies linked PE data with study outcomes, it was unclear which of the reported PE components were specifically linked to the positive outcomes.

Conclusions: While the Medical Research Council's framework is a valuable source for conducting systematic reviews on PEs, it has been criticized for lacking practical advice on how to conduct them. The lack of information on PE frameworks in our review also made it difficult to categorize individual PE components against the framework. We need clearer guidance and robust frameworks for conducting PEs for the development and reporting of DPIs for women with GDM.

Trial registration: PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020208212; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=208212.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211034010.

Keywords: complex interventions; gestational diabetes mellitus; implementation; process evaluation; randomized controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram of search. GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, Malanda B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;138:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023.S0168-8227(18)30203-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kytö Mikko, Koivusalo S, Tuomonen H, Strömberg Lisbeth, Ruonala A, Marttinen P, Heinonen S, Jacucci G. Supporting the management of gestational diabetes mellitus with comprehensive self-tracking: mixed methods study of wearable sensors. JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Oct 31;8:e43979. doi: 10.2196/43979. https://diabetes.jmir.org/2023//e43979/ v8i1e43979 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vézina-Im Lydi-Anne, Perron J, Lemieux S, Robitaille J. Promoting fruit and vegetable intake in childbearing age women at risk for gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomised controlled trial. J Health Psychol. 2019 Apr;24(5):600–612. doi: 10.1177/1359105316680021.1359105316680021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baptiste-Roberts K, Barone BB, Gary TL, Golden SH, Wilson LM, Bass EB, Nicholson WK. Risk factors for type 2 diabetes among women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2009 Mar;122(3):207–214.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.09.034. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19272478 S0002-9343(08)00981-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li Z, Cheng Y, Wang D, Chen H, Chen H, Ming WK, Wang Z. Incidence rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 170,139 women. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:3076463. doi: 10.1155/2020/3076463. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3076463 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources