Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 6;20(2):e0315596.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315596. eCollection 2025.

Beyond pleasurable and meaningful: Psychologically rich entertainment experiences

Dominique S Wirz  1 , Allison Eden  2 , Ezgi Ulusoy  2 , Morgan E Ellithorpe  3
Affiliations

Beyond pleasurable and meaningful: Psychologically rich entertainment experiences

Dominique S Wirz et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Entertainment experiences have been conceptualized as hedonic (pleasurable) or eudaimonic (meaningful), mirroring the hedonic and eudaimonic components of psychological well-being. However, psychologists have proposed a third component of well-being: psychological richness, which is characterized by variety, novelty, and interest. In this paper we explore the role of psychological richness in film and television entertainment experiences. Two studies, an experience sampling study (n = 28) and a survey (students in the US, n = 247 and general population in Germany, n = 289) show the prevalence of experience of psychological richness during media use and its positive relationship with well-being. A replication with a different scale (n = 291) demonstrates that psychologically rich entertainment experiences may have been previously been conflated by some measures of eudaimonic entertainment. Incorporating psychologically rich entertainment experiences as a third addition to hedonic and eudaimonic experiences can increase the intervention potential of media used to enhance well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: an introduction. J Happiness Stud. 2008. Jan 1;9(1):1–11.
    1. Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull. 1984;95(3):542–75. - PubMed
    1. Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N. Well-Being [Internet]. Russell Sage Foundation; 1999. [cited 2022 Jun 16]. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7758/9781610443258 - DOI
    1. Proctor C, Tweed R. Measuring Eudaimonic Well-Being. In: Vittersø J, editor. Handbook of Eudaimonic Well-Being [Internet]. Cham: Spr inger International Publishing; 2016. [cited 2022 Jun 16]. p. 277–94. (International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life). Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-42445-3_18 - DOI
    1. Ryan RM, Huta V, Deci EL. Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. J Happiness Stud. 2008. Jan;9(1):139–70.

LinkOut - more resources