Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 6.
doi: 10.1007/s00066-025-02367-2. Online ahead of print.

Assessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavitary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy

Andre Karius  1   2 , Vratislav Strnad  3   4 , Michael Lotter  3   4 , Stephan Kreppner  3   4 , Ricarda Merten  3   4 , Rainer Fietkau  3   4 , Christoph Bert  3   4 , Claudia Schweizer  3   4
Affiliations

Assessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavitary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy

Andre Karius et al. Strahlenther Onkol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Needle tracking using external prediction techniques such as optical tracking is a modern approach aimed at improving implantation accuracy in gynecologic brachytherapy. This study aims to investigate the corresponding impact of needle bending in situ and to analyze needle path deviations from the intended locations occurring in our current clinical workflow that only considers ultrasound imaging without tracking.

Methods: We developed a semi-automated approach for reconstructing brachytherapy needles based on planning CTs and compared the respective accuracy to the also determined intra-observer variability of manual reconstructions. Based on this, we measured needle bending in situ for 89 patients and calculated the Euclidean distances between actual needle tips and needle tip predictions both longitudinally and laterally to the insertion direction. Furthermore, we compared actual and intended spacings between inserted needles to estimate implantation uncertainties with respect to our current clinical workflow.

Results: Our developed reconstruction featured an accuracy of 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, which was improved compared to the intra-observer variability of 0.21 ± 0.11 mm. Needle bending depended strongly on needle length and ranged from 3.6 ± 2.1 mm for 100-120 mm needles up to 7.9 ± 3.0 mm for 200-220 mm needles. Deflections in the transverse direction were substantially higher than tip deviations in the longitudinal direction. Furthermore, we found deviations from an equidistant spacing between needle paths of 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in the transverse direction.

Conclusion: Inserting brachytherapy needles can be substantially affected by transverse needle bending in situ, which should therefore be corrected for in prediction approaches such as optical tracking.

Keywords: Adaptive brachytherapy; Image guidance; Intraoperative navigation; Needle displacement; Optical infrared tracking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: A. Karius, V. Strnad, M. Lotter, S. Kreppner, R. Merten, R. Fietkau, C. Bert, and C. Schweizer declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Strnad V, Niehoff P, Lössl K et al (2023) Practical handbook of brachytherapy, 2nd edn. UNI-MED, pp 28–135
    1. Venselaar JLM, Baltas D, Meigooni AS et al (2013) Comprehensive brachytherapy. CRC Press, pp 3–434
    1. Rogowski P, Rottler M, Walter F et al (2022) Clinical outcome of combined intracavitary / interstitial brachytherapy using a hybrid applicator in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 166(3):576–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.06.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Serban M, Fokdal L, Nielsen SK et al (2021) Characterization of combined intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy including oblique needles in locally advanced cervix cancer. Brachytherapy 20(4):796–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2021.03.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarwar KA, Hussain S, Syed AS et al (2023) Outcomes and comparison of dosimetric parameters between intracavitary (Fletcher) and combined intracavitary/interstitial (Utrecht) brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 23:1631–1638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.09.004 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources