Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 30;40(3):183-189.
doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6461. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Ocular and the whole body radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Affiliations

Ocular and the whole body radiation exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Bahtiyar Muhammedoğlu et al. Turk J Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the average whole body radiation exposure, which changes significantly according to during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) difficulty and to determine whether an ocular protection device must be used by analyzing applied ocular radiation.

Material and methods: Patients >18 years of age in whom an ERCP had been indicated were prospectively included in the study.

Results: A total of 1173 patients were included. Increased applied radiation dose significantly correlated with increased shot rate (Rho= 0.789, p <0.001), ERCP duration (Rho= 0.487, p <0.001), cost (Rho= 0.129, p <0.001), and LOS (Rho= 0.109, p <0.001). The whole body, skin, and eye radiation exposure doses were found to be lower than the recommended limit per year (20 mSv/year).

Conclusion: Limit of ocular radiation exposure during ERCP did not exceed the recommended annual limit (20 mSv/year), and it was also detected to be much lower than that. Therefore, the use of ocular visors is not recommended.

Keywords: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; fluoroscopy duration; radiation exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Correlation matrix depicting association among age, shot, duration, cost, and length of stay (LOS).*p< 0.05, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Eye radiation exposure through the years gone by for the operator (brown) and accompanying two nurses (red-mean value). *A maximum of 20 mSv per year is the determined limit value according to provision of laws.
Figure 3
Figure 3. The whole body and skin radiation exposure through the years gone by for the operator (number before forward slash sign means the month of the year). Red line delineates the mean radiation exposure of two accompanying nurses (avarage of the whole body and skin radiation). *A maximum of 20 mSv per year is the determined limit value according to provision of laws.

References

    1. Chen MY, Van Swearingen FL, Mitchell R, Ott DJ. Radiation exposure during ERCP: Effect of a protective shield. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43(1):1–5. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70250-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor ER, Kramer B, Frye TP, Wang S, Schwartz BF, Kohler TS. Ocular radiation exposure in modern urological practice. J Urol. 2013;190(1):139–143. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.081. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garg MS, Patel P, Blackwood M, Munigala S, Thakkar P, Field J, et al. Ocular radiation threshold projection based off of fluoroscopy time during ERCP. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(5):716–721. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.540. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharjee A, Das PJ, Adhikari P, Marbaniang D, Pal P, Ray S, et al. Novel drug delivery systems for ocular therapy: With special reference to liposomal ocular delivery. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;29(1):113–126. doi: 10.1177/1120672118769776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mekaroonkamol P, Keilin S. Editorial: ERCP-related radiation cataractogenesis: Is it time to be concerned. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(5):722–724. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.100. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources