Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 1;37(2):165-172.
doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000001445. Epub 2025 Feb 7.

Reversal of Roe v. Wade and implications of legal restrictions for neonatal care

Christine E Bishop  1 , Maya Manian  2
Affiliations
Review

Reversal of Roe v. Wade and implications of legal restrictions for neonatal care

Christine E Bishop et al. Curr Opin Pediatr. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review examines the implications of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on neonatal care and explores how legal restrictions on abortion are influencing medical practices for neonates and the broader healthcare landscape for neonates.

Recent findings: The Dobbs decision has led to increased uncertainty and challenges in both maternal and neonatal healthcare. Restrictive abortion laws are associated with higher infant mortality rates, increased health disparity, and increased care provider ethical dilemmas and moral distress due to legal uncertainty surrounding the care of infants. However, current changes in federal and state law regarding abortion do not change the previously established standard of care for neonates. Other federal legal statutes potentially addressing the care of neonates have existed for over 20 years and have had minimal effect on the practice of neonatology, because there is no record of federal enforcement actions or federal case law to clarify how the law should be interpreted.

Summary: While restrictive abortion laws primarily affect women and pregnant people's health care, indirect effects on neonatal care are becoming more common. There are other laws and policies with greater potential to regulate care for infants at the federal and state level. Professional medical standards remain the guiding framework in neonatal care. Clinicians can mitigate legal concerns through knowledge and advocacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Manian M. The impact of Dobbs on health care beyond wanted abortion care. J Law Med Ethics 2023; 51:592–600.
    1. Grossman D, Joffe C, Kaller S, et al. Care Post-Roe: documenting cases of poor-quality care since the Dobbs decision 2024.
    1. Frederiksen B, Ranji U, Gomez I, Salganicoff A. A national survey of OBGYNs’ experiences after Dobbs. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2023.
    1. Lindgren Y, Oberman M. Recalibrating risk under Dobbs. 2024. Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5003888 .
    1. Silverstein J, Van Loon K. The implications of the Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v Wade for women with pregnancy-associated cancers. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:1394–1395.