Comparison of the Methods Fixation and Staining of Infected Macrophages with Recovery of Promastigotes in Culture to Evaluate Phagocytosis and Amastigote Proliferation of Leishmania sp. in vitro
- PMID: 39918640
- DOI: 10.1007/s11686-025-00990-8
Comparison of the Methods Fixation and Staining of Infected Macrophages with Recovery of Promastigotes in Culture to Evaluate Phagocytosis and Amastigote Proliferation of Leishmania sp. in vitro
Abstract
Purpose: Infection of macrophages is a mandatory step for Lesihmania to promote mammalian infection and the evaluation of parasites proliferating inside macrophages reveals important information about parasites virulence and leishmanicidal drugs. Here we compare macrophage phagocytosis ability and amastigote proliferation of L. major or L. braziliensis by two different methods: fixation and staining of infected macrophages or recovery of promastigotes in culture.
Methods: Promastigote parasites were used to infect thioglycolate-elicited BALB/c mice peritoneal macrophages. Phagocytosis was evaluated at 3 h after infection and amastigote proliferation was evaluated directly or indirectly at 3, 6, and 9 days after infection.
Results: Phagocytosis of L. major and L. braziliensis by murine macrophages was respectively 54.38 ± 10.41% and 62.54 ± 19.01%, according to the fixation and staining method. The infection index (product of the percentage of infected cells X the number of parasites per cell) obtained by fixation and staining method showed proliferation of L. major inside macrophage from 108.42 ± 25.57 (3 h) to 510.09 ± 99.13 (9 days) and decrease of the number of L. braziliensis from 223.01 ± 58.46 (3 h) to 101.37 ± 20.06 (9 days). The parasites recovered/ mL in culture increased for L. major infected macrophage from 2,38 × 106 ± 2,31 × 106 (3 h) to 16,8 × 106 ± 8,3 × 106 (9 days) and decreased from 8.43 × 106 ± 6.8 × 106 (3 h) to 0.19 × 106 ± 0.21 × 106 (9 days) for L. braziliensis infected macrophage. The fixation and staining method allowed to observe that both parasite species proliferated inside of some macrophages, while other macrophages maintain the parasite number unaltered or even kill the parasite.
Conclusion: Both methods showed that L. major proliferates in vitro inside of murine macrophages while L. braziliensis are mostly eliminated by these cells. Only fixation and staining allowed to identify L. braziliensis susceptible macrophages in vitro.
Keywords: Leishmania braziliensis; Leishmania major; Amastigote proliferation; Murine macrophage.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethical Approval: The present research was submitted to and approved by Animal Research Ethics Committee (CEUA) of the Federal University of Goias under protocol 102/2019. Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Burza S, Croft SL, Boelaert M (2018) Leishmaniasis. Lancet. 392(10151):951–970. https://doi.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31204-2
-
- WHO WHO (2023) Global leishmaniasis surveillance, 2022: assessing trends over the past 10 years. In Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2024(26/02/2024)
-
- Akhoundi M, Kuhls K, Cannet A et al (2016) A historical overview of the classification, evolution, and dispersion of Leishmania Parasites and sandflies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(3):e0004349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0004349 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Siripattanapipong S, Boontanom P, Leelayoova S et al (2019) In vitro growth characteristics and morphological differentiation of Leishmania martiniquensis promastigotes in different culture media. Acta Trop. 197:105039. https://doi.10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.05.030
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources