Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul-Sep;38(3):410-417.
doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.12.016. Epub 2025 Feb 6.

The efficacy of Mulligan mobilization and corticosteroid injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy of Mulligan mobilization and corticosteroid injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial

Burak Menek et al. J Hand Ther. 2025 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of rotator cuff (RTC) tears commonly involves manual therapy, exercise, and injection methods. These treatments are typically administered together as components of a physical therapy intervention. However, it is not known which intervention is more effective.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine the impact of mobilization with movement (MWM) mobilization, a technique from Mulligan approaches, and corticosteroid (CS) injection on pain, functionality, and proprioception in cases of RTC tears.

Study design: This was a single-blinded randomized clinical trial.

Methods: Participants with RTC tears (n = 60) were divided into Mulligan mobilization (MM) and CS groups. The participants in the MM group performed mobilization with movement and a conventional exercise program; the CS group received a CS injection in addition to conventional exercises. The Visual Analog Scale, The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, active range of motion (AROM), and joint position sense (JPS) were evaluated. The outcomes were analyzed using effect size, minimum clinically important difference, minimal detectable change, Wilcoxon test, and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results: Both groups significantly improved in all measured outcomes at 3 weeks. The MM group showed significantly better (p < 0.05, Cohen d range 0.82-3.2) results in pain, AROM (Flexion, abduction, extension, external rotation, internal rotation), and proprioception (30° and 60° of flexion and abduction). Between-group differences in AROM were also clinically meaningful as they exceeded their MDC90 and minimum clinically important difference values.

Conclusions: Although both of these treatment methods may be successful in the short-term management of chronic RTC, the MM approach combined with conventional exercises seems to be a more effective approach for improving shoulder pain, function, and proprioception in this patient population.

Clinical trial number: NCT05933382.

Keywords: Corticosteroid; Injection; Manual therapies; Mobilization with movement rotator cuff injuries; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest No authors have any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence this study.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources