Associations between degree of food processing and colorectal cancer risk in a large-scale European cohort
- PMID: 39921517
- DOI: 10.1002/ijc.35361
Associations between degree of food processing and colorectal cancer risk in a large-scale European cohort
Abstract
Industrial food processing has been linked to various health outcomes including cancer. To examine associations between the degree of food processing and risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its sub-sites, data from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC) including 6155 incident CRC cases (n = 450,111 participants), were analyzed. Dietary intakes were assessed using baseline food frequency questionnaires. Foods were classified into culinary ingredients, unprocessed, processed (PFs), and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) according to the Nova classification. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for established CRC risk factors, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) associated with a 10% increase in proportion of consumption (%g/d) of each Nova group. Substitution analysis examined the effect of replacing UPFs and PFs with unprocessed foods on CRC risk. A 10% increase in proportion of UPFs was associated with 6% higher CRC risk (95% CI:1.02-1.10). A positive association was also found between PFs and CRC risk (HR per 10% increase: 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.15]). Conversely, unprocessed food consumption was inversely associated with CRC risk (HR per 10% increase: 0.93[95% CI, 0.90-0.95]). Substitution of 10% of the overall proportion of the diet comprising UPFs or PFs with 10% unprocessed foods was associated with a decreased risk of CRC (HRUPFs: 0.94 [95% CI, 0.90-0.97]; HRPFs: 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.94]). In conclusion, UPF was positively associated with CRC risk while diets richer in unprocessed foods were associated with lower CRC risk. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms by which food processing affects CRC risk.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; EPIC; Nova classification; UPFs; obesity.
© 2025 UICC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229‐263.
-
- World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer: a global perspective. Continuous Update Project Report. 2018 https://www.wcrf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Colorectal-cancer-report...
-
- Levy RB, Andrade GC, da Cruz GL, et al. Three decades of household food availability according to NOVA—Brazil, 1987‐2018. Rev Saude Publica. 2022;56:75.
-
- Juul F, Parekh N, Martinez‐Steele E, Monteiro CA, Chang VW. Ultra‐processed food consumption among US adults from 2001 to 2018. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022;115(1):211‐221.
-
- Mertens E, Colizzi C, Peñalvo JL. Ultra‐processed food consumption in adults across Europe. Eur J Nutr. 2022;61(3):1521‐1539.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical