Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Mar:53:102311.
doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2025.102311. Epub 2025 Feb 7.

Molecular effects of clinically relevant chemotherapeutic agents on choline phospholipid metabolism in triple negative breast cancer cells

Affiliations

Molecular effects of clinically relevant chemotherapeutic agents on choline phospholipid metabolism in triple negative breast cancer cells

Caitlin M Tressler et al. Transl Oncol. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most lethal breast cancer subtype, leading to poor patient outcomes despite aggressive treatment with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. There are currently no clinical tests available which measure early on whether TNBC patients respond to the selected chemotherapy treatment regimen. The magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-detected total choline (tCho) signal was shown to be a promising biomarker for assessing the response to chemotherapy treatment early on, as breast tumor tCho decreases after the first treatment cycle in patients who respond to chemotherapy cocktails. We sought to further investigate these clinical observations at the molecular level by combining metabolic and transcriptomic studies in two human TNBC cell lines treated with six different chemotherapeutic agents. Overall, our findings show that the glycerophosphocholine-to-phosphocholine ratio (GPC/PC) was a more sensitive and more broadly applicable measure of TNBC response to various chemotherapeutic agents than tCho. Specific chemotherapeutic drugs, including 5-fluorouracil and melphalan, resulted in the most significant effects on choline phospholipid metabolism, while other drugs did not significantly alter choline phospholipid metabolism. Overall, several of the six tested chemotherapeutic drugs mainly affected the expression levels of phosphatidylcholine (PtdC)-specific phospholipases and lysophospholipases, leading to the observed GPC/PC and tCho changes following treatment with the chemotherapeutic agents that altered choline phospholipid metabolism. The presented metabolic and transcriptomic findings support that the GPC/PC ratio and PtdC-phospholipases and -lysophospholipases could be further developed for assessing the response to chemotherapy treatment in TNBC patients. Statement of Significance: We show that the glycerophosphocholine-to-phosphocholine ratio and phosphatidylcholine-specific-phospholipases and -lysophospholipases are reliable markers for assessing the response to several chemotherapeutic agents, which could help with selecting correct treatments for TNBC patients.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Choline; Magnetic resonance; Metabolism; Phospholipid; Spectroscopy; Treatment response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1:
Fig. 1
Representative spectra of choline phospholipid metabolites from each treatment group (top to bottom: PXL, VRL, 5-FU, MPL, CPT, DOXO) compared to DMSO vehicle control (CON, bottom) for human MDA-MB-231 (left) and SUM159 (right) TNBC cells. Expanded regions of 1H HR MR spectra displaying free Cho (3.209 ppm), PC (3.227 ppm), and GPC (3.236 ppm) are shown at the same magnitude in all groups.
Fig. 2:
Fig. 2
Quantitation of the choline phospholipid metabolites (A) free choline (Cho), (B) phosphocholine (PC), (C) glycerophosphocholine (GPC), and (D) lipid phosphatidylcholine (PtdC) from HR 1H MRS spectra for each treatment group (DOXO, CPT, MPL, 5-FU, VRL, PXL) compared to DMSO vehicle control (CON) for MDA-MB-231 (black bars) and SUM159 (gray bars) TNBC cells. Data are shown as mean values ± standard error of three independent experiments. * represents p < 0.05.
Fig. 3:
Fig. 3
Quantitation of (A) total choline (tCho) and (B) the GPC/PC ratio from HR 1H MRS spectra for each treatment group (DOXO, CPT, MPL, 5-FU, VRL, PXL) compared to DMSO vehicle control (CON) for MDA-MB-231 (black bars) and SUM159 (gray bars) TNBC cells. Data are shown as mean values ± standard error of three independent experiments. * represents p < 0.05.
Fig. 4:
Fig. 4
Pearson's correlation values for all chemotherapy treatments combined in (A) both cell lines, (B) MDA-MB-231 cells, and (C) SUM159 cells. Positive correlations are shown in red and negative correlations in blue. Color depths indicate significance levels. Corresponding p-values are shown in the supporting information in Tables S2-S4. * represents p < 0.05.
Fig. 5:
Fig. 5
Pearson's correlation values for all chemotherapy treatments causing tCho decreases (MPL, 5-FU, CPT in MDA-MB-231; MPL, 5-FU, DOXO in SUM159) in (A) both cell lines, (B) MDA-MB-231 cells, and (C) SUM159 cells. Positive correlations are shown in red and negative correlations in blue. Color depths indicate significance levels. Corresponding p-values are shown in the supporting information in Tables S5-S7. * represents p < 0.05.
Fig. 6:
Fig. 6
Pearson's correlation values for all chemotherapy treatments causing GPC/PC changes (increased GPC/PC for DOXO in MDA-MB-231 and MPL, 5-FU, VRL, PXL in SUM159; decreased GPC/PC for 5-FU, PXL in MDA-MB-231) in (A) both cell lines, (B) MDA-MB-231 cells, and (C) SUM159 cells. Positive correlations are shown in red and negative correlations in blue. Color depths indicate significance levels. Corresponding p-values are shown in the supporting information in Tables S8-S10. * represents p < 0.05.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Colombet M., Soerjomataram I., Parkin D.M., Pineros M., Znaor A. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int. J. Cancer. 2021 - PubMed
    1. Harbeck N., Thomssen C., Gallen Gnant M.St. 2013: brief preliminary summary of the consensus discussion. Breast. Care (Basel) 2013;8:102–109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collignon J., Lousberg L., Schroeder H., Jerusalem G. Triple-negative breast cancer: treatment challenges and solutions. Breast. Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2016;8:93–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dent R., Trudeau M., Pritchard K.I., Hanna W.M., Kahn H.K., Sawka C.A. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4429–4434. - PubMed
    1. Partridge A.H., Rumble R.B., Carey L.A., Come S.E., Davidson N.E., Leo A.D. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for women with Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–Negative (or unknown) advanced breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:3307–3329. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources