Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 9;13(2):e009890.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-009890.

Real-world outcomes with tisagenlecleucel in aggressive B-cell lymphoma: subgroup analyses from the CIBMTR registry

Affiliations

Real-world outcomes with tisagenlecleucel in aggressive B-cell lymphoma: subgroup analyses from the CIBMTR registry

Daniel J Landsburg et al. J Immunother Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Tisagenlecleucel, a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is approved for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) after ≥2 lines of therapy. When used in real-world settings, tisagenlecleucel has shown similar efficacy and improved safety compared with previous clinical trials. However, long-term data on real-world outcomes are lacking.

Methods: Clinical data from a cohort of patients treated with tisagenlecleucel in a real-world setting were captured in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. The main clinical outcomes analysed included response rate, duration of response, survival, adverse events and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics that may affect those outcomes.

Results: As of May 2022, 1159 patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rate was 59.5%, and the complete response rate was 44.5%. With a median follow-up of 23.2 months in the efficacy set (n=968), the 24 month rates of progression-free survival, ongoing response and overall survival were 28.4%, 52.6% and 43.6%, respectively. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were reported in 6% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. Patients with DLBCL (vs HGBCL), complete response before infusion, prior autologous or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) within normal limits experienced more favourable efficacy outcomes, and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of ≥2, ≥3 prior lines of therapy, elevated LDH and fludarabine-based lymphodepleting chemotherapy experienced less favourable safety outcomes.

Conclusions: This real-world study of tisagenlecleucel for patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL shows consistent efficacy and better safety outcomes than the pivotal trial. This study also identifies baseline disease characteristics and prior or concurrent treatments that may affect clinical outcomes.Tisagenlecleucel, a CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, is approved for adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) after ≥2 lines of therapy. When used in real-world settings, tisagenlecleucel has shown similar efficacy and improved safety compared with previous clinical trials. However, long-term data on real-world outcomes are lacking.Clinical data from a cohort of patients treated with tisagenlecleucel in a real-world setting were captured in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. The main clinical outcomes analysed included response rate, duration of response, survival, adverse events, and clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics that may affect those outcomes.As of May 2022, 1159 patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL received tisagenlecleucel. The overall response rate was 59.5%, and the complete response rate was 44.5%. With a median follow-up of 23.2 months in the efficacy set (n=968), the 24 month rates of progression-free survival, ongoing response, and overall survival were 28.4%, 52.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. Grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity were reported in 6% and 7.4% of patients, respectively. Patients with DLBCL (vs HGBCL), complete response before infusion, prior autologous or allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) within normal limits experienced more favourable efficacy outcomes, and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, ≥3 prior lines of therapy, elevated LDH, and fludarabine-based lymphodepleting chemotherapy experienced less favourable safety outcomes.In conclusion, this real-world study of tisagenlecleucel for patients with R/R DLBCL/HGBCL shows consistent efficacy and better safety outcomes than the pivotal trial. This study also identifies baseline disease characteristics and prior or concurrent treatments that may affect clinical outcomes.

Keywords: B cell; Chimeric antigen receptor - CAR; Hematologic Malignancies; Immunotherapy; Lymphoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: DJL: ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, Epizyme, Karyopharm, Morphosys: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis, Triphase: Research funding. MJF: BMS, JnJ/Legend, Iovance, Novartis, Kite/Gilead, Cytoagents: Consultancy; Novartis, Kite/Gilead, Arcellx: Research funding. MH: none. SRF: Novartis, Janssen, BMS: consultancy, honoraria and Speakers bureau. BTH: Kite/Gilead: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, travel support; Kite/Gilead, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy, honoraria, and research funding. GS: None. CAJ: Kite/Gilead, Pfizer: Research funding; Kite/Gilead, Novartis, BMS/Celgene, Lonza, Ispen, Epizyme, Bluebird Bio, Instil Bio, ImmPACT Bio, Daiichi Sankyo, AbbVie, Humanigen, Nkarta, Precision BioSciences: Consultancy and honoraria; Axis, Clinical Care Options: Speakers bureau; Novartis, Lonza, Humanigen, Precision BioSciences: Travel support. SJ: Kite, Novartis: Research funding; CRISPR Therapeutics, Kite, Novartis, Gamida: Consultancy. FLL: Allogene, Bluebird Bio, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, BMS, CERo Therapeutics, National Cancer Institute, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Research funding; Allogene, Amgen, Bluebird Bio, BMS/Celgene, Cellular Biomedicine Group, Calibr, Cowen, EcoR1, Emerging Therapy Solutions, Gerson Lehrman Group, GammaDelta Therapeutics, Iovance, Janssen, Kite/Gilead, Legend Biotech, Novartis, Umoja, Wugen, Celgene, A2, Daiichi Sankyo, Sana, Takeda: Consultancy; Aptitude Health, ASH, BioPharm Communications, CAREducation, Clinical Care Options Oncology, Imedex, Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Education or editorial activity; Other: patents, royalties, other intellectual property from several patents held by the institution in my name (unlicensed) in the field of cellular immunotherapy. RR: Gilead, Novartis, Takeda, BMS: Honoraria. PAR: BMS, ADC Therapeutics, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Nektar Therapeutics, Intellia Therapeutics, BeiGene, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, CVS Caremark, Genmab, AbbVie: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, CRISPR Therapeutics, MorphoSys, Calibr, Tessa Therapeutics, Fate Therapeutics, Xencor, Genentech: Research funding; BMS, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Sana Biotechnology, BeiGene: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; Kite/Gilead: Speakers bureau. GLS: Janssen, Amgen, Beyond Spring, BMS: Research Funding. LLP: none. RT: Novartis, current employment. SL: Novartis, current employment. MM: Novartis, current employment. AM: Novartis, current employment and current holder of stock options in a privately held company. MCP and BMS, Novartis, Kite, Janssen, Research funding; BMS: consultancy. CJT: Nektar Therapeutics, Caribou Biosciences, T-CURX, Myeloid Therapeutics, Arsenal Bio, Century Therapeutics, Cargo Therapeutics, eGlint, Differentia Bio, Advesya, IGM Therapeutics, GSK, Decheng Capital, Boxer Capital, Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Allogene, Legend Bio, Kyverna, Expert Connect, Prescient Therapeutics, AbbVie: Consultancy and advisory roles; Juno Therapeutics, Nektar Therapeutics, Nanostring: Research funding; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center: Patents and royalties; Caribou Bioscience, Myeloid Therapeutics, Arsenal Bio, eGlint Cargo Therapeutics: Current holder of stock options in a privately held company.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Real-world efficacy outcomes after tisagenlecleucel infusion. Kaplan–Meier estimates for (A) progression-free survival, (B) duration of response and (C) overall survival in the efficacy set. For PFS and DOR, eight patients in ongoing CR/PR were censored at the time of post-infusion consolidative haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT); for OS, patients were not censored at the time of post-infusion HSCT. For DOR, time is relative to the onset of the first remission, 1 month=30.4 days. For PFS and OS, time is relative to the first infusion, 1 month=30.4 days. Nominal P values are reported and calculated by using the log-rank test to compare the best overall response (BOR) of CR vs BOR of PR. P values are not adjusted for multiplicity. CR, complete response; NE, not estimable; PR, partial response.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of patient demographics and disease characteristics on efficacy and safety outcomes after tisagenlecleucel infusion. Multivariable analyses of patient demographics and disease characteristics on (A) efficacy outcomes in the efficacy set and (B) safety outcomes in the safety set with tisagenlecleucel. Multivariable logistic regression model estimates are presented for ORR, any cytokine release syndrome (CRS), CRS grade of ≥3, any immune effector-cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and ICANS grade ≥3; multivariable Cox regression model estimates are presented for DOR, OS and PFS. CRS and ICANS were graded according to the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria and were based on the maximum grade that occurred within 100 days of tisagenlecleucel infusion. For each comorbidity group, ‘No’ indicates the absence of the specific comorbidity of interest. a71/968 (7.3%) patients were in CR at the time of infusion in the efficacy evaluable set. b73/990 (7.4%) patients were in CR at the time of infusion in the safety evaluable set. CR, complete response; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; DOR, duration of response; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HGBCL, high grade B-cell lymphoma; HSCT, haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IPI, International Prognostic Index; LD, lymphodepleting; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.

References

    1. Friedberg JW. Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2011;2011:498–505. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2011.1.498. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skrabek P, Assouline S, Christofides A, et al. Emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Curr Oncol. 2019;26:253–65. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5421. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thuresson P-O, Vander Velde N, Gupta P, et al. A Systematic Review of the Clinical Efficacy of Treatments in Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma. Adv Ther. 2020;37:4877–93. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01507-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:45–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1804980. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1403–15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00375-2. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources