A Review of Judgments of Learning and Executive Functions in Spaced Learning: The Enemy of Spacing?
- PMID: 39925536
- PMCID: PMC11807400
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77230
A Review of Judgments of Learning and Executive Functions in Spaced Learning: The Enemy of Spacing?
Abstract
The benefit of the spacing effect is inherently hindered by perception bias in making judgments of learning (JOLs), but more insights might be found in the context of executive functions (EF), where it correlates with metacognitive strategies and cognitive loads. Thus, this article attempts to address the dilemma of the spacing effect by synthesizing both existing JOL and EF perspectives. This paper yields various mechanisms related to memory performance in spaced learning: delayed JOLs, JOL reactivity, overt retrieval, inhibition control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. All of these factors associate with the theory of mind, an important yet understudied social-cognitive skill in spaced learning which could shift our ways of thinking about spacing.
Keywords: delayed jol; executive functions; jol reactivity; judgments of learning; spacing effect.
Copyright © 2025, Yuan et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):771-783. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1406523. Epub 2017 Nov 29. Memory. 2018. PMID: 29187067
-
The effect of delayed judgments of learning on retention.Metacogn Learn. 2021;16(2):407-429. doi: 10.1007/s11409-021-09260-0. Epub 2021 Feb 27. Metacogn Learn. 2021. PMID: 33679269 Free PMC article.
-
Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):745-758. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01025-5. Mem Cognit. 2020. PMID: 32124334
-
Memory and Executive Functions Subserving Judgments of Learning: Cognitive Reorganization After Traumatic Brain Injury.Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 Oct;32(9):2203-2226. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2021.1929345. Epub 2021 May 18. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022. PMID: 34006181
-
A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):741-750. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1404111. Epub 2017 Nov 21. Memory. 2018. PMID: 29161973
References
-
- From the lab to the dorm room: metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study. Susser JA, McCabe J. Instr Sci. 2013;41:345–363.
-
- Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later? Cohen MS, Yan VX, Halamish V, Bjork RA. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013;39:1682–1696. - PubMed
-
- Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"? Kornell N, Bjork RA. Psychol Sci. 2008;19:585–592. - PubMed
-
- Metacognition and the spacing effect: the role of repetition, feedback, and instruction on judgments of learning for massed and spaced rehearsal. Logan JM, Castel AD, Haber S, Viehman EJ. Metacogn Learn. 2012;7:175–195.
-
- Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. Son LK. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010;36:255–262. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources