Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan 24;10(4):4102-4120.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c10621. eCollection 2025 Feb 4.

Evaluation of the Gly-Phe-Lys Linker to Reduce the Renal Radioactivity of a [64Cu]Cu-Labeled Multimeric cRGD Peptide

Affiliations

Evaluation of the Gly-Phe-Lys Linker to Reduce the Renal Radioactivity of a [64Cu]Cu-Labeled Multimeric cRGD Peptide

Zhao-Hui Jin et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Radiometal-labeled peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals (RLPB-radiopharmaceuticals) are promising for cancer imaging and targeted radiotherapy; however, their effectiveness is often compromised by the high retention of nonspecific radioactivity in the kidneys due to renal excretion pathways. Current strategies to address this issue have limitations, highlighting the need for innovative approaches to improve targeting specificity and therapeutic efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the applicability of the Gly-Phe-Lys (GFK) tripeptide, a renal brush border (RBB) enzyme-cleavable linkage, to reduce renal radioactivity in RLPB-radiopharmaceuticals using the integrin-targeting radiopeptide [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RAFT-c(-RGDfK-)4 ([64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD). We designed and synthesized the model compound [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(benzoyl [Bz]), its predictive metabolites, and GFK-incorporated [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD derivatives [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD and [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(beta-alanine [βA])3-RaftRGD. In vitro studies showed that dual radiometabolites, namely, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G and [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GF, were simultaneously released from [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz) by different RBB enzymes, whereas both RaftRGD derivatives released only [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GF. When injected into mice, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz) and the two RaftRGD derivatives led to the urinary excretion of [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G and [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GF, respectively. PET imaging and biodistribution studies showed the increased rates of reduction in renal radioactivity levels for the two RaftRGD derivatives compared to the parental [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD (e.g., PET: 1 to 24 h postinjection, 73.0 ± 2.3 and 75.6 ± 1.8 vs 43.0 ± 4.5%, p < 0.0001; biodistribution: 3 to 24 h, 61.1 and 74.4 vs 22.8%). Taken together, these results indicate that the designed renal cleavage occurred in vivo. We also noted the steric interference of the RaftRGD moiety on enzyme access, the spacer effect of the trimeric βA sequence (reduced steric hindrance), and the altered radiopharmacokinetics (e.g., initially increased renal accumulation) of the RaftRGD compounds upon linker incorporation. These findings provide important insights into the chemical design of RLPB-radiopharmaceuticals with reduced renal retention based on the RBB strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structures of [64Cu]Cu-radiolabeled amino acids or peptides using the bifunctional chelator cyclam. The dashed line between G and F indicates the site of renal brush border enzyme cleavage. GFK, Gly-Phe-Lys; Bz, benzoyl; Raft, cyclo(-Lys-Pro-Gly-Lys-Ala-Lys-Pro-Gly-Lys-Lys-); RGD, Arg-Gly-Asp; and βA, beta-alanine.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthetic Procedures for Cyclam-Gly-Phe-Lys (GFK)-RaftRGD (2) and Cyclam-GFK(beta-alanine)3-RaftRGD (3)
a) cyclam coupling using benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate/N,N-diisopropylethylamine in N,N-dimethylformamide; and b) cyclo(-RGDfK[COCHO]-) coupling in trifluoroacetic acid/H2O/CH3CN (70:15:15). Acim, acetimidate function; and Boc, tert-butoxycarbonyl.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Radiolabeling and characteristics of [64Cu]Cu-compounds. (A) RP-HPLC radiochromatograms and (B) corresponding TLC images of radiolabeling reaction mixtures of [64Cu]CuCl2 and cyclam-conjugated amino acids or peptides (37 MBq: 1 nmol) after incubation at 90 °C for 15 min. (C) Radiochemical yields (RCYs) determined by RP-HPLC (n = 5–6) and TLC (n = 7–9), and LogD values (n = 2 or 4). G, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G; GFK(Bz), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz); RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD; GFK-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD; and GFK(βA)3-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD. Values shown in (B) represent the retention factors of radiocompounds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
TLC imaging of cleavage effects of renal brush border membrane vesicles (RBBMVs) on the GFK tripeptide linkage. (A) Time-dependent effect: [64Cu]Cu-compounds (185 kBq/0.005 nmol/μL) were incubated with 10 mg/mL RBBMVs at 37 °C for 10 min, 2, 5, 17, and 24 h. (B) Dose-dependent effect: [64Cu]Cu-compounds (same concentrations as above) were incubated with 1, 3, 5, or 10 mg/mL RBBMVs at 37 °C for 24 h. (C) TLC profiles and corresponding RP-HPLC radiochromatograms: [64Cu]Cu-compounds (same concentrations as above) were incubated with 10 mg/mL RBBMVs at 37 °C for 5 h. G, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G; GFK(Bz), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz); RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD; GFK-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD; GFK(βA)3-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD; and Rf, retention factor.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Differential effects of designated inhibitors on in vitro cleavage actions of renal brush border membrane vesicles (RBBMVs) on the GFK tripeptide linkage. Upper panels: TLC imaging of 185 kBq/0.005 nmol/μL of [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz) (GFK[Bz]), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD (GFK-RGD), and [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD (GFK[βA]3-RGD) after incubation with 10 mg/mL RBBMVs in the absence (control) or presence of various inhibitors (1 mM) at 37 °C for 5 or 24 h. Lower panels: Quantification of the percentages of radioactivity for each radiocomponent shown in the upper images (n = 1). Rf, retention factor; and G, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G.
Figure 5
Figure 5
In vivo cleavage actions of renal brush border enzymes on the GFK tripeptide linkage examined in normal mice administered intravenously with 7.4 MBq [64Cu]Cu-compounds (0.8 nmol) as indicated. (A) Percentage injected radioactivity dose (%ID; n = 1–2) excreted in urine during each indicated time period. (B) TLC imaging of urine samples collected 0–6 h postinjection (p.i.), and (C) corresponding RP-HPLC radiochromatograms of selected urine samples as indicated. G, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G; GFK(Bz), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz); RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD; GFK-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD; GFK(βA)3-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD; and Rf, retention factor.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Analyses of [64Cu]Cu-cyclam and [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GF for identification of radiometabolite-X. (A) Chemical structure of [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GF. (B) RP-HPLC radiochromatograms and corresponding TLC images of radiolabeling mixtures of [64Cu]CuCl2 and cyclam or cyclam-conjugated amino acids or peptides (37 MBq: 1 nmol) after incubation at 90 °C for 15 min. (C) Radiochemical yields (RCYs) determined by RP-HPLC and TLC (n = 3–4), and LogD values (n = 2). (D) RP-HPLC radiochromatograms and corresponding TLC images of urine samples collected 0–6 h postinjection (p.i.) of [64Cu]Cu-compounds (7.4 MBq, 0.2 nmol) as indicated and (E) those of the mixtures of [64Cu]Cu-compounds and mouse urine as standards. Cyclam, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam; G, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G; GF, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GF; and GFK(Bz), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz). Values shown in TLC images indicate the retention factors of radiocompounds.
Figure 7
Figure 7
PET imaging of normal mice administered intravenously with 2.92–4.26 MBq of [64Cu]CuCl2 or [64Cu]Cu-labeled compounds (0.3 nmol). Dynamic PET scans were performed 0–60 min postinjection (p.i.). (A) Representative maximum-intensity projection PET images at 0–5 and 50–60 min p.i. (B) Time–activity curves for organs of interest. Cyclam, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam; G, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-G; GFK(Bz), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz); RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD; GFK-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD; GFK(βA)3-RGD, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD; B, urinary bladder; GB, gallbladder; H, heart; I, intestine; L, liver; and K, kidney.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Effects of incorporating the GFK tripeptide linkage on the biodistribution profiles of the GFK-incorporated [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD derivatives. Normal mice (n = 4/group) were intravenously injected with 0.74 MBq/0.068 nmol of [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD (RGD), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD (GFK-RGD), or [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD (GFK[βA]3-RGD) and examined at 3 and 24 h postinjection (p.i.). *, **, ***, ****p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001, and 0.0001, respectively.
Figure 9
Figure 9
PET imaging of U87MG tumor-bearing mice administered intravenously with 16.9–18.3 MBq/0.1 nmol of [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-RaftRGD (RGD), [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD (GFK-RGD), or [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD (GFK[βA]3-RGD). Static PET scans were performed at 1, 3, 5, 17, and 24 h postinjection (p.i.). (A) Representative coronal PET images. (B) Chronological tumor uptake levels quantified from PET images. (C) Representative PET images of kidneys (transverse) and renal uptake levels. (D) Chronological uptake ratios of kidney, liver, and tumor relative to values at 1 h p.i. n = 3/group (except n = 2 in the GFK[βA]3-RGD group at 5 h p.i.); B, urinary bladder; L, liver; K, kidney; T, tumor; *p < 0.05 at all the time points; and #p < 0.05 at 1, 3, and 5 h p.i.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Suggested mechanisms underlying the in vitro (AC) and in vivo (DF) cleavage actions of renal brush border membrane (RBBM) enzymes on the GFK tripeptide linkage in [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-labeled compounds. A and D, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(Bz); B and E, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK-RaftRGD; and C and F, [64Cu]Cu-cyclam-GFK(βA)3-RaftRGD. 64Cu, [64Cu]Cu; and RPTEC, renal proximal tubule epithelial cell.

Similar articles

References

    1. Kręcisz P.; Czarnecka K.; Królicki L.; Mikiciuk-Olasik E.; Szymański P. Radiolabeled peptides and antibodies in medicine. Bioconjugate Chem. 2021, 32, 25–42. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00617. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pandey S.; Malviya G.; Chottova Dvorakova M. Role of peptides in diagnostics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8828.10.3390/ijms22168828. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mikulova M. B.; Mikuš P. Advances in development of radiometal labeled amino acid-based compounds for cancer imaging and diagnostics. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021, 14, 167.10.3390/ph14020167. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khalily M. P.; Soydan M. Peptide-based diagnostic and therapeutic agents: Where we are and where we are heading?. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2023, 101, 772–793. 10.1111/cbdd.14180. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hu K.; Shang J.; Xie L.; Hanyu M.; Zhang Y.; Yang Z.; Xu H.; Wang L.; Zhang M.-R. PET imaging of VEGFR with a novel 64Cu-labeled peptide. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 8508–8514. 10.1021/acsomega.9b03953. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources