Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3528-S3530.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1029_24. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

Comparison of Retreatability of AH Plus Sealer and Bioceramic Sealer with Solvent, Retreatment Files and Diode Laser: A CBCT and SEM Analysis

Affiliations

Comparison of Retreatability of AH Plus Sealer and Bioceramic Sealer with Solvent, Retreatment Files and Diode Laser: A CBCT and SEM Analysis

Sapana Sapana et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Aim: The present study evaluated the retreatability of canals obturated using AH Plus sealer and Bioceramic (BC) sealers, employing Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM).

Methodology: A group of 90 extracted premolars was classified into two main categories based on whether they were sealed with AH Plus or BC Sealer. Each of these categories was then divided into two subcategories according to the retreatment technique applied. CBCT and SEM were used to assess the residual filling material within the canals.

Results: The findings showed that there was no marked statistical variation in the retreatment success of canals sealed with BC and AH Plus sealers.

Conclusion: The diode laser was the most effective modality for eliminating root canal filling materials in the least amount of time. None of the retreatment modalities used removed the obturating material completely.

Keywords: AH plus sealer; SEM; bioceramic sealer; retreatment files; root canal retreatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Karamifar K, Tondari A, Saghiri MA. Endodontic periapical lesion: An overview on the etiology, diagnosis and current treatment modalities. Eur Endod J. 2020;5:54–67. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thapak G, Arya A, Grewal MS, Arora A. A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal using erbium: YAG laser-activated irrigation, sonic irrigation, and manual dynamic irrigation: A scanning electron microscope study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2021;12:e22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grischke J, Muller-Heine A, Hulsmann M. The effect of four different irrigation systems in the removal of a root canal sealer. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1845–51. - PubMed
    1. Hess D, Solomon E, Spears R, He J. Retreatability of a bioceramic root canal sealing material. J Endod. 2011;37:1547–9. - PubMed
    1. Kim H, Kim E, Lee SJ, Shin SJ. Comparisons of the retreatment efficacy of calcium silicate and epoxy resin-based sealers and residual sealer in dentinal tubules. J Endod. 2015;41:2025–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources