Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb;22(1):11-23.
doi: 10.1177/17407745241259086. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

A survey on UK researchers' views regarding their experiences with the de-identification, anonymisation, release methods and re-identification risk estimation for clinical trial datasets

Affiliations

A survey on UK researchers' views regarding their experiences with the de-identification, anonymisation, release methods and re-identification risk estimation for clinical trial datasets

Aryelly Rodriguez et al. Clin Trials. 2025 Feb.

Abstract

Background: There are increasing pressures for anonymised datasets from clinical trials to be shared across the scientific community. However, there is no standardised set of recommendations on how to anonymise and prepare clinical trial datasets for sharing, while an ever-increasing number of anonymised datasets are becoming available for secondary research. Our aim was to explore the current views and experiences of researchers in the United Kingdom about de-identification, anonymisation, release methods and re-identification risk estimation for clinical trial datasets.

Methods: We used an online exploratory cross-sectional descriptive survey that consisted of both open-ended and closed questions.

Results: We had 38 responses to invitation from June 2022 to October 2022. However, 35 participants (92%) used internal documentation and published guidance to de-identify/anonymise clinical trial datasets. De-identification, followed by anonymisation and then fulfilling data holders' requirements before access was granted (controlled access), was the most common process for releasing the datasets as reported by 18 (47%) participants. However, 11 participants (29%) had previous knowledge of re-identification risk estimation, but they did not use any of the methodologies. Experiences in the process of de-identifying/anonymising the datasets and maintaining such datasets were mostly negative, and the main reported issues were lack of resources, guidance, and training.

Conclusion: The majority of responders reported using documented processes for de-identification and anonymisation. However, our survey results clearly indicate that there are still gaps in the areas of guidance, resources and training to fulfil sharing requests of de-identified/anonymised datasets, and that re-identification risk estimation is an underdeveloped area.

Keywords: Clinical trials; data anonymisation; data sharing; de-identification; re-identification; re-identification risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dal-Ré R. Access to anonymized individual participant clinical trials data: a radical change of mind by the most prestigious medical journals. Arch Bronconeumol 2018; 54(2): 65–67. - PubMed
    1. Pisani E, Aaby P, Breugelmans JG, et al.. Beyond open data: realising the health benefits of sharing data. BMJ 2016; 355: i5295. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertagnolli M, Sartor O, Chabner B, et al.. Advantages of a truly open-access data-sharing model. N Engl J Med 2017; 12: 1178–1181. - PubMed
    1. Clinical Study Data Request (CSDR). Clinical Study Data Request, 2020, https://clinicalstudydatarequest.com/
    1. The Yale University. Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) Project, 2020, http://yoda.yale.edu/

LinkOut - more resources