Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Mar;211(3):436-451.
doi: 10.1164/rccm.202501-0011ST.

Lung Cancer Screening and Incidental Findings: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Review

Lung Cancer Screening and Incidental Findings: A Research Agenda: An Official American Thoracic Society Research Statement

Louise M Henderson et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) may uncover incidental findings (IFs) unrelated to lung cancer. There may be potential benefits from identifying clinically significant IFs that warrant intervention and potential harms related to identifying IFs that are not clinically significant but may result in additional evaluation, clinician effort, patient anxiety, complications, and excess cost. Objectives: To identify knowledge and research gaps and develop and prioritize research questions to address the approach to and management of IFs. Methods: We convened a multidisciplinary panel to review the available literature on IFs detected in lung cancer screening LDCT examinations, focusing on variability and standardizing reporting, management of IFs, and evaluation of the benefits and harms of IFs, particularly cardiovascular-related IFs. We used a three-round modified Delphi process to prioritize research questions. Results: This statement identifies knowledge gaps in 1) reporting of IFs, 2) management of IFs, and 3) identifying and reporting coronary artery calcification found on lung cancer screening LDCT. Finally, we present the panel's initial 36 research questions and the final 20 prioritized questions. Conclusions: This statement provides a prioritized research agenda to further efforts focused on evaluating, managing, and increasing awareness of IFs in lung cancer screening.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease; incidental findings; lung cancer screening; net benefits.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Incidental findings found on lung cancer screening.

References

    1. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, Church TR, Fagerstrom RM, Galen B, et al. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology . 2011;258:243–253. - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans MA, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening in a randomized trial. N Engl J Med . 2020;382:503–513. - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA, Force USPST Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med . 2014;160:330–338. - PubMed
    1. Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. US Preventive Services Task Force Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA . 2021;325:962–970. - PubMed
    1. Henderson LM, Su I-H, Rivera MP, Pak J, Chen X, Reuland DS, et al. Prevalence of lung cancer screening in the US, 2022. JAMA Netw Open . 2024;7:e243190. - PMC - PubMed