The Regulatory Landscape of Biobanks In Europe: From Accreditation to Intellectual Property
- PMID: 39931203
- PMCID: PMC11808582
- DOI: 10.2174/0113892029313697240729091922
The Regulatory Landscape of Biobanks In Europe: From Accreditation to Intellectual Property
Abstract
Biobanks are necessary resources for the storage and management of human biological materials, such as biofluids, tissues, cells, or nucleotides. They play a significant role in the development of new treatments and the advancement of basic and translational research, especially in the field of biomarkers discovery and validation. The regulatory landscape for biobanks, which is necessary to safeguard both privacy and scientific discoveries, exhibits significant heterogeneity across different countries and regions. This article outlines the standards that modern biobanks should fulfill in the European Union (EU), including general, structural, resource, process, and quality requirements. Special attention is given to the importance of transparency and donor consent following the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the ISO 20387:2018, the international standard specifies general requirements for biobanks. A dedicated section covers the preparation of donor information materials, emphasizing consent for research involvement and personal data processing. The delicate balance between donors' privacy rights and scientific research promotion is also discussed, with a focus on the patenting and economic use of biological material-derived inventions and data. Considering these factors, it would be warranted to refine legal frameworks and foster interdisciplinary collaboration to ethically and responsibly expand biobanking.
Keywords: Biobanks; biological materials; biomarkers; clinical studies; translational research; transparency and consent.
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Biobanking, digital health and privacy: the choices of 1410 volunteers and neurological patients regarding limitations on use of data and biological samples, return of results and sharing.BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01102-3. BMC Med Ethics. 2024. PMID: 39334200 Free PMC article.
-
IT solutions for privacy protection in biobanking.Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):254-62. doi: 10.1159/000336663. Epub 2012 Jun 20. Public Health Genomics. 2012. PMID: 22722689
-
Pediatric biobanks to enhance clinical and translational research for children.Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Apr;182(4):1459-1468. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04818-3. Epub 2023 Jan 24. Eur J Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 36692622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The landscape of biobanks in Poland-characteristics of Polish biobanking units at the beginning of BBMRI.pl organization.J Transl Med. 2021 Jun 22;19(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02926-y. J Transl Med. 2021. PMID: 34158056 Free PMC article.
-
Biobanks in Horizon 2020: sustainability and attractive perspectives.EPMA J. 2018 Nov 23;9(4):345-353. doi: 10.1007/s13167-018-0153-7. eCollection 2018 Dec. EPMA J. 2018. PMID: 30538786 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
ESR1 testing on FFPE samples from metastatic lesions in HR + /HER2- breast cancer after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Breast Cancer Res. 2025 May 14;27(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s13058-025-02020-x. Breast Cancer Res. 2025. PMID: 40369610 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gramatiuk S., Huppertz B. In: Biobanks in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Relevance, Setup and Management. Sargsyan K., Huppertz B., Gramatiuk S., editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. Types of Biobanks. pp. 17–20. - DOI