Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;170(1):101-107.
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16187. Epub 2025 Feb 11.

Demystifying cervical endometriosis: A case series and systematic review

Affiliations

Demystifying cervical endometriosis: A case series and systematic review

Shailja Verma et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Cervical endometriosis (CE) is an uncommon diagnosis with a paucity of evidence on its management.

Objective: To examine 10 years of data to identify CE cases and to conduct a systematic review to evaluate evidence for managing CE.

Search strategy: Cases of CE were obtained retrospectively via a pathology coding system. Literature search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (1949-2022).

Selection criteria: Studies on diagnoses and management of CE were included, and those with retrospective diagnosis of CE on histology and no further management were excluded.

Data collection and analysis: An Excel spreadsheet was used for data collection. Two independent authors went through individual cases, extracting and analyzing data.

Main results: In case series, women presented with intermenstrual bleeding (IMB)/post-coital bleeding (PCB) n-25, (30%), followed by abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) n-24, (29%), dysmenorrhea n-12, 12%, and/or dyspareunia (12%). In all, 44% had an initial cervical biopsy confirming CE diagnosis and 48% had CE on hysterectomy specimen. Main reasons for hysterectomy were AUB (36%) and fibroids/adenomyosis (28%). In the systematic review, 1737 studies were identified from databases, 181 were assessed for eligibility, and 14 studies discussed individual case reports and case series specifically on treating CE. Nine full-text and abstract studies were available to identify potential treatment options for CE. Treatments were based predominantly on presentation at time of diagnosis.

Conclusion: Findings from case series suggest that CE was the main diagnosis in women who had a hysterectomy for AUB or had a cervical biopsy for PCB/IMB. Investigations should be considered to rule out CE to have the potential for conservative alternative treatment rather than major surgery. There is no clear guidance on managing CE and good-quality studies are required to provide conclusive treatment options.

Keywords: cervical biopsy; cervical endometriosis; endometriosis; intermenstrual bleeding; laparoscopy and hysterectomy; post‐coital bleeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C, et al. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2698‐2704.
    1. Gardner HL. Cervical and vaginal endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1966;9:358‐372.
    1. Fels E. Endometriose der portio. Zbl Gynakol. 1928;52:285.
    1. Siddall RS, Mack HC, Detroit M. Primary endometriosis of the vaginal portion of the cervix uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949;58(4):765‐769.
    1. Wong FWS, Lim CED, Karia S, Santos L. Cervical endometriosis: case series and review of literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):916‐919.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources