Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May;48(5):443-453.
doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01511-8. Epub 2025 Feb 11.

Emerging Tools to Support DILI Assessment in Clinical Trials with Abnormal Baseline Serum Liver Tests or Pre-existing Liver Diseases

Affiliations
Review

Emerging Tools to Support DILI Assessment in Clinical Trials with Abnormal Baseline Serum Liver Tests or Pre-existing Liver Diseases

Jasmine Amirzadegan et al. Drug Saf. 2025 May.

Abstract

Based on the late Dr. Hyman Zimmerman's observation that hepatocellular drug-induced liver injury (DILI) leading to jaundice carries a ≥ 10% fatality risk (coined as Hy's law by others), evaluation of Drug-Induced Serious Hepatotoxicity (eDISH) continues to play a central role in the assessment of a study drug's liability for acute hepatocellular DILI. The eDISH identifies drugs in clinical trials with DILI fatality (death or transplant) risk that may be unacceptable in a post-market setting. As a two-dimensional graph that plots peak total bilirubin (TB) versus peak serum aminotransferase levels for each patient during study drug or comparator treatment, eDISH identifies potential cases of acute, modest, and serious hepatocellular DILI for in-depth analysis of liver tests (LT) and clinical course so that the likelihood of causal association with the study drug can be determined. Unfortunately, the generalizable utility of this tool only pertains to trials enrolling patients with normal or near normal (NNN) baseline (BL) serum LTs. The eDISH does not necessarily apply to trials of patients with abnormal baseline (ABN-BL) LTs that often coincide with underlying liver disorders. Because drug development programs being reviewed by the FDA increasingly target liver disorders, we are often challenged to evaluate DILI risk in trials of patients with ABN-BL LTs. Also, the high background prevalence of metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) means patients with LTs above NNN may need to be enrolled in trials treating non-liver disorders to reflect the target population. Such study populations create challenges for industry and regulators because eDISH may not reliably categorize or identify potential cases of DILI for further analysis, as it so efficiently does in NNN-BL trials. We describe the main functionalities of eDISH in NNN-BL trials to understand what should be emulated by new tools or eDISH modifications. We then discuss non-eDISH-based plots that may be useful in ABN-BL trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Funding: The Research Participation Program at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (Grant no. CDER-OND-M-24-11192). Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Disclaimer: The conclusions and views in this manuscript are the authors and do not represent an official position of the Food and Drug Administration. Ethics Approval: Not applicable. Data are not identifiable to any drug product, subject, or patient. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent to Publication: Not applicable. Availability of Data: Not applicable. Datasets from new drug applications are not publicly available. Code Availability: Composite coding available on GitHub. Other coding to be available on GitHub shortly. Author Contributions: JA: study design, programming, data analysis, manuscript writing; BT: programming, data analysis; YVP: study design, manuscript writing; EN: study design, data analysis, manuscript writing; MIA: Study design, manuscript writing; PHH: study design, data analysis, manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Hypothetical eDISH plot of a trial with active treatment (Drug x) and placebo arms, enrolling approximately two to one. Each subject’s maximum (Max), on-treatment total bilirubin (TB) and maximum on-treatment aminotransferase (alanine aminotransferase [ALT] or aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) are plotted. Four quadrant categories are defined by TB >2× upper limit of normal (ULN) and ALT or AST ≥ 3 × ULN. Potential Hy’s Law quadrant may contain drug-induced liver injury (DILI) subjects with a 10% fatality risk. The subjects circled in red may be prioritized for in-depth review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Modified eDISH (mDISH) plot based on peak total bilirubin (TB) and peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in times baseline (× baseline [BL]) and modified from a clinical trial with three treatment arms (red triangles, blue squares, and green circles). Each data point represents one subject’s peak on-treatment TB and ALT levels in multiples of their own baseline values. Hypothetical Subjects A and B plot to the same location because each had a peak bilirubin four times their baseline values and peak ALT five times their baseline values. However, Subject B’s jaundice and ALT of 1000 U/L suggest a more severe potential drug-induced liver injury (DILI) compared to Subject A’s bilirubin and ALT. Subject C’s deeper jaundice and ALT rise suggest a more worrisome injury compared to Subject A’s or B’s bilirubin and ALT, yet Subject C is lower and more to the left compared to Subjects A and B
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sankey plots and cross table counts for a Study 1 and b Study 2. Sankey baseline categorizations are in the middle. Peak on-treatment shifts from baseline for the placebo treatment arm move left, while shifts from baseline for the active treatment arm move right. All categorizations are based on × upper limit of normal (ULN) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and total bilirubin (TB) levels. Unfavorable shifts (potential drug-induced liver injury [DILI]) move upward and are highlighted in pink. Study 1 had fewer types of upward shifts (3 vs 5), and fewer total numbers in these shifts (13 vs 15) in the drug arm compared to placebo. Study 2 had markedly more upward (pink) and downward (green) shifts in the drug arm compared to placebo arm. Cross tables have shift counts with unfavorable (potential DILI) in red, favorable (potential efficacy) in green, and neutral shifts in grey and yellow for each arm. Near normal (NN) = ALT between ULN and < 3 × ULN
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Composite plot modified eDISH (mDISH) plot adapted from Tesfaldet et al [12]. Only the five subjects from Study 2 who met alanine  aminotransferase (ALT) (× upper limit of normal [ULN]) and total bilirubin (TB) (×ULN) criteria for Hy’s Law quadrant are plotted. The category (quadrant) of origin for each subject is indicated by marker color and shape. Four of the five subjects started in the normal or near normal quadrant at baseline (green squares), and one subject started in Temple’s quadrant at baseline (blue plus sign). There were no subjects in Hy’s Law quadrant based on peak values who were in that quadrant at baseline or in the cholestasis quadrant at baseline
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Modified waterfall plot for Study 2. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in U/L are plotted for each subject’s baseline value along the black lines and each subject’s maximum change on treatment are depicted by vertical bars, blue for the placebo arm subjects and bronze for active treatment arm subjects. Subjects who developed jaundice have green bars. The active treatment arm had more subjects with decrease in ALT seen by the large number of bronze bars dropping below baseline compared to the number of blue bars dropping below baseline for placebo subjects. However, there were more subjects in the active treatment arm with substantial increases in ALT over baseline and several developed jaundice. These cases may have had drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and can be easily identified and prioritized for in-depth analyses

References

    1. Senior JR. Evolution of the Food and Drug Administration approach to liver safety assessment for new drugs: current status and challenges. Drug Saf. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S9-17. 10.1007/s40264-014-0182-7. (published Online First: 2014/10/30). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Watkins PB, Seligman PJ, Pears JS, Avigan MI, Senior JR. Using controlled clinical trials to learn more about acute drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology. 2008;48(5):1680–9. 10.1002/hep.22633. - PubMed
    1. Avigan MI. DILI and drug development: a regulatory perspective. Semin Liver Dis. 2014;34(2):215–26. 10.1055/s-0034-1375961. (published Online First: 20140531). - PubMed
    1. Avigan M, Munoz, MA. Perspectives on the Regulatory and Clinical Science of Drug-induced Liver Injury. Drug-Induced Liver Toxicity: Springer Protocols, 2018:367-93.
    1. Drug-induced liver injury (DILI): Current status and future directions for drug development and the post-market setting. A consensus by a CIOMS Working Group.; 2020; Geneva, Switzerland. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), https://cioms.ch/publications/product/drug-induced-liver-injury/. Accessed 12 Jun 2024.

MeSH terms