Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):e0317910.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317910. eCollection 2025.

Acceptability and implementation potential of colorectal cancer screening and health literacy training: A qualitative study among general practitioners in deprived areas

Géraldine Cazorla  1 , Niamh M Redmond  2   3 , Aurore Lamouroux  4   5 , Alix Boirot  1 , Michel Rotily  6 , Maria Claudia Addamiano  2 , Christian Balamou  7 , Zineb Doukhi  8 , Myriam Kaou  9 , Françoise Couranjou  10 , Cyrille Delpierre  2 , Julien Mancini  1   11 , Marie-Anne Durand  12   13
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Acceptability and implementation potential of colorectal cancer screening and health literacy training: A qualitative study among general practitioners in deprived areas

Géraldine Cazorla et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant contributor to cancer-related burden, ranking second in cancer mortality in France. Despite the proven survival benefits of systematic CRC screening, uptake remains suboptimal, particularly among people with limited health literacy (HL) and lower socioeconomic position. This study aimed to assess the acceptability of an e-learning training programme on HL and CRC screening among general practitioners (GPs) in deprived areas while also exploring strategies for its promotion and scale-up.

Methods: A qualitative study nested within the DECODE cluster-randomised controlled trial (NCT04631692) across four French regions was conducted. Semi-structured interviews (phone or online) were carried out to capture opinions, experiences, and recommendations of GPs in the intervention arm. Thematic analysis, employing manual and NVivo coding, was performed.

Results: The majority of 22 GPs (16/22) found the training acceptable, informative, tailored to their knowledge needs and offering great flexibility of use. The module on HL garnered more interest than the one on CRC screening, as it addressed a relatively new area for many GPs. It facilitated reflection on patient communication techniques and identified areas for improvement in physician-patient interaction. A perceived gap in the training was the insufficient interactivity in both didactic and virtual group sessions.

Conclusion: The findings of this study show high acceptability of the e-learning training by participants, indicating a potential for implementation, if kept concise, self-paced, asynchronous, and with a stronger focus on HL. The training helped GPs reflect on their practices, enhance HL knowledge, and improve patient communication strategies, leading some to adopt new techniques in daily interactions with low HL patients, beyond just screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have read the journal’s policy and one author of this manuscript have the following competing interests: MA-D has contributed to the development of Option Grid patient decision aids outside of the submitted work. EBSCO Information Services sells subscription access to Option Grid patient decision aids. She receives consulting income from EBSCO Health, and royalties outside of the submitted work. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials”.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al.. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. mai 2021;71(3):209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. https://www.e-cancer.fr/Professionnels-de-sante/Les-chiffres-du-cancer-e... [Internet]. [cité 1 mars 2024]. https://www.e-cancer.fr/Professionnels-de-sante/Les-chiffres-du-cancer-e...
    1. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, Ederer F, Geisser MS, Mongin SJ, et al.. The Effect of Fecal Occult-Blood Screening on the Incidence of Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med. 30 nov 2000;343(22):1603–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011303432203 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arrêté du 19 mars 2018 modifiant l’arrêté du 29 septembre 2006 relatif aux programmes de dépistage organisé des cancers et portant modification du cahier des charges du dépistage organisé du cancer colorectal—Légifrance [Internet]. [cité 28 févr 2024]. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000036732278/
    1. Cancer du colon rectum [Internet]. [cité 28 févr 2024]. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/cancers/canc...

Publication types