Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;36(6):1149-1162.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06061-w. Epub 2025 Feb 11.

Patients' Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies

Nienke J E Osse  1   2 , Marian K Engberts  3 , Hugo W F van Eijndhoven  3 , Paul L P Brand  4 , Marco H Blanker  5
Affiliations

Patients' Perceptions of Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Scoping Review of Qualitative Studies

Nienke J E Osse et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Treatment options for female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are often offered in a stepped-care approach. However, the shift towards patient-centred care and shared decision making (SDM) has prompted an increased interest in patients' perceptions of treatment decision making. This scoping review maps the available qualitative research on women's perceptions of the treatment decision-making process for SUI and identifies knowledge gaps.

Methods: This scoping review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Three databases were searched using a systematic search strategy, without restriction in publication date or language. After thorough screening, 19 of the initial 3,473 publications were included.

Results: Four themes were identified; pre-existing experiences and notions that women bring to the consultations (things women consider before their consultation); treatment and patient characteristics (treatment aspects and personal values patients deem important); aspects of the consulting health care professional and facilities (availability of treatment options and counselling styles of physicians); ways of reaching a decision (three different ways that women used to make their decision. There were gaps in the literature on aspects affecting women's treatment preferences, their preferred decision-making style and how they want to be involved in this decision-making process.

Conclusions: This scoping review provides a global overview of women's perceptions on and preferences for treatment for SUI, and highlights a lack of knowledge on women's ideas of the treatment decision process. To provide clinicians with better guidance for their counselling and decision-making approaches, studies on women's perceptions of the decision-making process and the different decision-making styles are needed.

Keywords: Patient perceptions; Qualitative research; Shared decision making; Stress urinary incontinence; Treatment decision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval: Ethics/Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval does not apply to review studies. Conflicts of Interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis 2020 flow diagram of the study selection process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Themes and subthemes identified in the treatment decision-making process for stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, Creta M, La Falce S, Waltregny D, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):567–91. - PubMed
    1. Imamura M, Hudson J, Wallace SA, MacLennan G, Shimonovich M, Omar MI, et al. Surgical interventions for women with stress urinary incontinence: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2019;365:l1842. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Todhunter-Brown A, Hazelton C, Campbell P, Elders A, Hagen S, McClurg D. Conservative interventions for treating urinary incontinence in women: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;9(9):CD012337. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoe V, Haller B, Yao HH, O’Connell HE. Urethral bulking agents for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021;40(6):1349–88. - PubMed
    1. Capobianco G, Madonia M, Morelli S, Dessole F, De Vita D, Cherchi PL, et al. Management of female stress urinary incontinence: a care pathway and update. Maturitas. 2018;109:32–8. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources