Sperm oxidative damage acquired during seminal plasma removal for assisted reproductive technology is reduced by BGP-15
- PMID: 39934465
- PMCID: PMC12055704
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03418-4
Sperm oxidative damage acquired during seminal plasma removal for assisted reproductive technology is reduced by BGP-15
Abstract
Purpose: Semen manipulation for assisted reproductive technology (ART) causes spermatozoa damage; thus, we investigated the potential of the novel therapeutic BGP-15 to preserve sperm quality during semen washing prior to insemination.
Methods: Donated human ejaculates (N = 40), with or without 10 µM BGP-15, were analyzed for sperm motility, DNA fragmentation, and oxidation. Seminal plasma was removed using different clinical sperm selection methods: simple wash, swim-up, or density gradient centrifugation (DGC), followed by assessment for sperm motility, mitochondrial ROS (mtROS), mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and DNA fragmentation and oxidation.
Results: Donated semen samples incubated with BGP-15 had increased sperm motility (+ 15%, p = 0.002) and reduced oxidative DNA damage levels (- 57%, p = 0.03). Samples processed by simple wash had the highest sperm count compared with DGC (+ 55%, p < 0.005) and swim-up (+ 21%, p < 0.0005). Swim-up showed increased vitality compared with DGC (+ 18%, p < 0.001) and simple wash (+ 27%, p < 0.0001), as well as the lowest DNA oxidation levels compared with simple wash - 40%, (p = 0.01) and DGC (- 76%, p < 0.0001). Swim-up also had the lowest mitochondrial membrane potential compared with simple wash and DGC (- 28%, p < 0.03). Comparison between untreated and BGP-15-treated groups for each sperm washing method showed that BGP-15 increased MMP in DGC sperm (+ 11%, p = 0.0006), and reduced DNA fragmentation in washed samples (- 22%, p = 0.03). Moreover, BGP-15 lowered DNA oxidation in all preparation methods: washed (- 48%, p = 0.002), swim-up (- 42%, p = 0.04), and DGC (- 29%, p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: The inclusion of BGP-15 during semen preparation can protect sperm quality and, in the future, may be used clinically to improve sperm selection methods.
Keywords: DNA damage; Male; Reproduction; Semen analysis; Spermatozoa*.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval: Human biological material (semen) was obtained in compliance with the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (NHMRC, 2007 and incorporating all updates). All study procedures were approved by the St. Andrew’s Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (Project 93), and the University of Adelaide’s HREC (33594). Human semen samples that were discarded as excess to patient treatment were provided by collaborative partners at Genea Fertility SA, St. Andrews Hospital (Adelaide, SA) following informed consent from patients. Competing interests: MBG and RLR are inventors on a patent related to this work filed by The University of Adelaide (AU2018337761A1, filed [21 September 2018], published [7 May 2020H]). RLR is a consultant for Mitochon Therapeutics. The authors declare no other competing interests.
Figures



References
-
- Adamson GD, Zegers-Hochschild F, Dyer S. Global fertility care with assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(3):473–82. - PubMed
-
- Agarwal A, Baskaran S, Parekh N, Cho CL, Henkel R, Vij S, Arafa M, Selvam MK, Shah R. Male infertility. Lancet. 2021;397(10271):319–33. - PubMed
-
- Bakos HW, Thompson JG, Feil D, Lane M. Sperm DNA damage is associated with assisted reproductive technology pregnancy. Int J Androl. 2008;31(5):518–26. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous