Efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer under prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis from clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022
- PMID: 39934515
- DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02716-2
Efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer under prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis from clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022
Abstract
Background: In early-stage breast cancer, dose-dense chemotherapy, which involves the administration of standard doses at shorter intervals, is safer when administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mitigate chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. This study aimed to thoroughly evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of dose-dense regimens based on the use of G-CSF.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the "Minds Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development" using PubMed, Ichushi-Web, and the Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies assessing dose-dense chemotherapy with prophylactic pegfilgrastim administration in early-stage breast cancer were included. Outcomes included overall survival, event-free survival, incidence of febrile neutropenia, quality of life (QOL), and pain. Meta-analyses were performed on outcomes with sufficient data.
Results: Our literature search identified 23 RCTs. Overall survival and event-free survival showed a trend favoring dose-dense therapy (hazard ratio, 0.90, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78 - 1.03, 0.80 - 1.01; p = 0.13; 0.07, respectively). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was similar between the groups (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI 0.58 - 1.40; p = 0.65). Mortality due to infection could not be compared owing to the small number of events. Pain increased with dose-dense therapy (odds ratio 2.57; 95% CI 1.00 - 6.62; p = 0.05), likely from G-CSF-induced bone pain. Only one study examined QOL, showing a decline with chemotherapy that recovered after treatment.
Conclusions: Dose-dense chemotherapy trended toward improved survival outcomes without increasing the risk of infection, although pain increased. Further research should identify the specific subgroups that most benefit from dose-dense regimens. More data are needed on the impact on QOL.
Keywords: Dose-dense chemotherapy; Early-stage breast cancer; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Neutropenia; Prophylactic pegfilgrastim.
© 2025. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: TE.Y. received honoraria from Kyowa-Kirin, Pfizer, Chugai, Eli Lilly, MSD, AstraZeneca and Eisai. Y.O. received honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Chugai, Lilly and Kyowa Kirin. K.T. received honoraria from Ono, Chugai, Taiho and Novartis. E.I. received honoraria from Eli Lilly, and research funding from MSD, Ono, Janssen Pharma and Takeda. Y.M. received honoraria from Ono, MSD, Takeda, Eisai and Bristol Myers Squibb, and research funding from MSD and Ono. S.Y. received research funding from Otsuka. D.M. received honoraria from Janssen, Nippon Shinyaku, Eisai, Mundipharma, Kyowa Kirin, Chugai, Zenyaku, MSD, SymBio, Sanofi, AbbVie, Takeda, Astra Zeneca and Bristol Myers Squibb, and research funding from Biopharma, Novartis, Kyowa Kirin, Ono, Chugai, Janssen, Takeda, Otsuka, Sanofi, Astellas, Bristol Myers Squibb, AbbVie, Eisai, MSD, Taiho and Astra Zeneca. T.M. received honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Chugai and Myriadgenetics. E.B. received honoraria from Chugai, and Daiichi-Sankyo, and research funding from Taiho and Chugai. T.KU. received honoraria from Chugai. T.KI. received honoraria from Sanofi. S.N. received honoraria from Kyowa Kirin. A.S. received honoraria and scholarship donation from Chugai and Taiho. T.T. received honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Chugai and Eli Lilly. Other authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript. The other authors have no conflict of interest. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: All authors consented to the publication of this study.
References
-
- Aapro MS, Cameron DA, Pettengell R et al (2006) EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphomas and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 42(15):2433–2453 - PubMed
-
- Gilewski T, Norton L (1996) Cytokinetics and breast cancer chemotherapy. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M et al (eds) Diseases of the Breast. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, PA, pp 751–768
-
- Citron ML, Berry DA, Cirrincione C et al (2003) Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol 21(8):1431–1439 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
