Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 11;24(1):41.
doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02382-w.

Building evidences in Public Health Emergency Preparedness ("BePHEP" Project)-a systematic review

Affiliations

Building evidences in Public Health Emergency Preparedness ("BePHEP" Project)-a systematic review

Michelangelo Mercogliano et al. Int J Equity Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Humanitarian crises exacerbate the vulnerability of already fragile healthcare systems and significantly increase the risk of infectious disease outbreaks in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This systematic review aims to evaluate strategies and interventions implemented in LMICs to prevent and manage infectious diseases outbreaks during humanitarian crises from 2018 to 2023.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, adhering to the PRISMA guideline and the SPIDER framework to identify relevant studies. The review included studies published between 2018 and 2023 focusing on infectious disease prevention and management in LMICs during humanitarian crises. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.

Results: Eleven studies were identified from 1,415 unique articles. These studies addressed diverse interventions, including vaccination campaigns, epidemiologic surveillance, and integrated health services. Cholera outbreaks in Haiti and Mozambique, triggered by gang violence, internal migration, and Cyclone Kenneth, were addressed through epidemiological surveillance, case management, WASH (Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene) service improvements, and oral vaccination campaigns. Mathematical models guided cholera vaccination in Thailand's refugee camps. In India, surveillance and rapid response measures successfully prevented infectious disease outbreaks during the Kumbh Mela gathering. The Philippines improved response times to climate-related disasters using point-of-care testing and spatial care pathways. Despite challenges in Yemen, evaluating malaria surveillance systems led to recommendations for integrating multiple systems. Uganda developed a national multi-hazard emergency plan incorporating vaccination, communication, and risk management, proving useful during the refugee crisis and Ebola outbreak. In South Sudan, integrating immunisation services into nutrition centres increased vaccination coverage among children. Nigeria experienced a rise in measles cases during armed conflicts despite vaccination efforts, while visual communication strategies improved SARS-CoV-2 vaccination rates.

Conclusion: These interventions highlight the importance of multimodal, targeted, and collaborative responses to address complex health crises without relying on unsustainable investments. Despite the effectiveness of these interventions, infrastructure limitations, insecurity, and logistical constraints were noted. These findings emphasize the need for adaptable and resilient healthcare systems and international collaboration to safeguard the right to health during complex humanitarian crises.

Keywords: Armed conflicts; Communicable diseases; Health Emergency Preparedness; Health system resilience; Humanitarian crises; Infectious diseases; LMICs; Low- and Middle-Income Countries; Natural disasters; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate and publication: Not applicable. Competing interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of the literature search, abstract screening, full article assessment for exclusion and inclusion criteria, with the most common reasons for exclusion being detailed

References

    1. Delforge D, Below R, Wathelet V, Loenhout JV, Speybroeck N. 2023 disasters in numbers. Brussels; 2024. [Online]. Available: https://files.emdat.be/reports/2023_EMDAT_report.pdf.
    1. W. B. Group. World Bank Country and Lending Groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-b.... Accessed 06/09/2024.
    1. Haar RJ, Rubenstein LS. Health in fragile and post-conflict states: a review of current understanding and challenges ahead. Med Confl Surviv. 2012;28(4):289–316. 10.1080/13623699.2012.743311. - PubMed
    1. Mavrouli M, Mavroulis S, Lekkas E, Tsakris A. Respiratory infections following earthquake-induced tsunamis: transmission risk factors and lessons learned for disaster risk management. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(9). 10.3390/ijerph18094952. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson ME. Geography of infectious diseases. Infect Dis. 2010. 10.1016/B978-0-323-04579-7.00101-5.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources