Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 10:28:e250003.
doi: 10.1590/1980-549720250003. eCollection 2025.

Bullying practices by students aged 13 to 17 years according to the National Survey of School Health (2019)

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations

Bullying practices by students aged 13 to 17 years according to the National Survey of School Health (2019)

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Deborah Carvalho Malta et al. Rev Bras Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the prevalence of bullying practices and associated factors among Brazilian adolescents, according to the National Survey of School Health 2019.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study with cluster sampling. The outcome variable, bullying practice, was assessed by the question: "In the last 30 days, have you mocked, ridiculed, teased, intimidated, or bullied any of your schoolmates to the point that they felt hurt, upset, offended, or humiliated?" (yes/no). Associations with sociodemographic characteristics, family environment, mental health, and risk behaviors were analyzed using Poisson regression with robust variance.

Results: 12.1% (95%CI 11.7-12.6) of adolescents reported bullying others. Positive associations were found among boys (PR 1.66; 95%CI 1.55-1.77); self-declared Black (PR 1.23; 95%CI 1.11-1.36) and brown (PR 1.1; 95%CI 1.02-1.18) adolescents; private school students (PR 1.29; 95%CI 1.21-1.37); those who felt lonely (PR 1.17; 95%CI 1.09-1.26); thought life was not worth living (PR 1.28; 95%CI 1.19-1.39); were physically assaulted by a family member (PR 1.67; 95%CI 1.55-1.79); skipped classes (PR 1.23; 95%CI 1.15-1.31); used tobacco (PR 1.34; 95%CI 1.22-1.47), alcohol (PR 1.38; 95%CI 1.28-1.50), and drugs (PR 1.17; 95%CI 1.04-1.31) regularly; and had sexual relations (PR 1.26; 95%CI 1.18-1.35). Ages 16 and 17 (PR 0.82; 95%CI 0.76-0.89) and family supervision were protective factors (PR 0.70; 95%CI 0.66-0.75).

Conclusion: Bullying was more likely among boys, younger adolescents, those with family and mental health issues, and those engaged in risk behaviors. The importance of practices, such as family supervision in preventing bullying, is highlighted.

Objetivo:: Analisar a prevalência de prática de bullying e fatores associados entre adolescentes brasileiros, segundo a Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar 2019.

Métodos:: Estudo transversal, com amostragem por conglomerados. A variável desfecho, prática de bullying, foi obtida pela pergunta "Nos últimos 30 dias, você esculachou, zombou, mangou, intimidou ou caçoou algum de seus colegas da escola tanto que ele ficou magoado, aborrecido, ofendido ou humilhado?" (sim/não). Foram analisadas associações com características sociodemográficas, familiares, saúde mental e comportamentos de risco, utilizando regressão de Poisson com variância robusta.

Resultados:: 12,1% (IC95% 11,7-12,6) dos adolescentes relataram praticar bullying. Houve associação positiva entre meninos (RP 1,66; IC95% 1,55-1,77); autodeclarados pretos (RP 1,23; IC95% 1,11-1,36) e pardos (RP 1,1; IC95% 1,02-1,18); de escola privada (RP 1,29; IC95% 1,21-1,37), que sentiam-se solitários (RP 1,17; IC95% 1,09-1,26), que a vida não vale a pena (RP 1,28; IC95% 1,19-1,39), apanharam de familiar (RP 1,67; IC95% 1,55-1,79), faltaram às aulas (RP 1,23; IC95% 1,15-1,31), usavam tabaco (RP 1,34; IC95% 1,22-1,47), álcool (RP 1,38; IC95% 1,28-1,50) e drogas regularmente (RP 1,17; IC95% 1,04-1,31) e tiveram relação sexual (RP 1,26; IC95% 1,18-1,35). A idade 16 e 17 anos (RP 0,82; IC95% 0,76-0,89) e supervisão familiar foram protetoras (RP 0,70; IC95% 0,66-0,75).

Conclusão:: Praticar bullying foi mais provável entre meninos, mais jovens, com problemas familiares e de saúde mental, e comportamentos de risco. Observa-se a importância de práticas como supervisão familiar contra o bullying.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS: nothing to declare

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Loneliness in Brazil.
    Giacomin K. Giacomin K. Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Jul 25;41(7):e00117625. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN117625. eCollection 2025. Cad Saude Publica. 2025. PMID: 40802368 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Menesini E, Salmivalli C. Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions. Psychol Health Med. 2017;22(supl 1):240–253. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oliveira WA. In: Handbook of stress and academic anxiety. Gonzaga LRV, Dellazzana-Zanon LL, Becker da Silva AM, editors. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. Bullying in adolescence and anxiety: an integrative review; pp. 81–92. - DOI
    1. Lembo VMR, Santos MA, Feijó MCB, Andrade ALM. Review of the characteristics of boys and girls involved in school bullying. Psicologia, Teoria e Prática. 2023;25(3):ePTPPE15019. doi: 10.5935/1980-6906/ePTPPE15019.en. - DOI
    1. Albdour M, Hong JS, Zilioli S, Lumley MA. Self-reported physical and psychological symptoms among victims and perpetrators of bullying in Arab American Adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2020;33(4):201–208. doi: 10.1111/jcap.12270. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jetelina KK, Reingle Gonzalez JM, Cuccaro PM, Peskin MF, Pompeii L, Atem F, et al. Mechanisms and frequency of violent injuries among victims and perpetrators of bullying. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(5):664–670. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.295. - DOI - PubMed