Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):93-99.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001468. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

Update on traumatic brain injury in the ICU

Rosalinde E R Slot  1 , Raimund Helbok  2   3 , Mathieu van der Jagt  1
Affiliations
Review

Update on traumatic brain injury in the ICU

Rosalinde E R Slot et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: This review aims to summarize recent developments for the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the ICU. Recent advancements in TBI ICU management emphasize a progression toward more multimodal approaches and mitigating secondary brain injury by increased focus on careful systemic management.

Recent findings: Invasive monitoring techniques such as continuous intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain tissue oxygen pressure (PbtO 2 ) monitoring are considered standard of care or may become crucial, respectively, for managing severe TBI. Technological advances in noninvasive techniques (e.g. quantitative pupillometry) are likely to advance our diagnostic and prognostic ability. Blood biomarkers, including glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light chain, and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1, provide minimally invasive ways to better assess injury severity and predict outcomes. These advancements support personalized care, which will likely influence clinical management strategies in the future.

Summary: ICP monitoring remains a key component of severe TBI management in ICU. Emerging evidence is slowly changing and improving intensive care and patient outcomes and include both brain-targeted therapies and careful systemic intensive care management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. James SL, Bannick MS, Montjoy-Venning WC, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019; 18:56–87. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, et al. ; InTBIR Participants and Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022; 21:1004–1060. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Åkerlund CAI, Holst A, Bhattacharyay S, et al. ; CENTER-TBI Participants and Investigators. Clinical descriptors of disease trajectories in patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit (CENTER-TBI): a multicentre observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2024; 23:71–80. - PubMed

    2. This study shows clinical disease trajectories in a multicenter setting, extensively describing contributing factors related to outcome, such as patient characteristics and biomarkers.

    1. Ferguson AR, Menon DK, Silverberg ND, et al. . Improved characterization/classification of TBI – the role of clinical assessment. Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2024. https://www.ninds.nih.gov/sites/default/files/documents/clinical-symptom....

    2. Summary of InTBIR consensus meeting with practical suggestion for TBI research and clinical management.

    1. Robba C, Graziano F, Guglielmi A, et al. ; SYNAPSE-ICU Investigators. Treatments for intracranial hypertension in acute brain-injured patients: grading, timing, and association with outcome. Data from the SYNAPSE-ICU study. Intensive Care Med. 2023; 49:50–61. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms