Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Feb 12;13(2).
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00156. eCollection 2025 Feb 1.

Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Review of Classification, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Best Practices

Affiliations
Review

Cauda Equina Syndrome: A Review of Classification, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Best Practices

Arjuna Karikaran et al. JBJS Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare but life-altering disease resulting from compression of the nerve roots at the spinal cord's terminus. CES typically presents with low back pain, sciatica, sensorimotor deficits, and bowel and bladder dysfunction. Owing to its rarity, the condition is often missed, leading to significant morbidity and potential legal implications for physicians.

Methods: This review synthesizes the current literature on CES, including its epidemiology, pathophysiology, classifications, and management strategies. Emphasis is placed on the diagnosis and treatment of CES as well as the legal implications of CES for spine surgeons.

Results: The literature reveals variability in the reported prevalence of CES, with incidence rates ranging from 0.34 to 7 per 100,000 individuals annually. The timing of decompression remains debated. Some studies report no significant difference in outcomes between decompression within 24 hours vs. 48 hours, while others emphasize the importance of immediate intervention. Legal cases related to CES frequently involve delayed diagnosis, with significant ramifications for physicians.

Conclusions: Surgical decompression remains the definitive treatment of CES, though the timing of surgery requires careful consideration to balance the urgency of intervention with the risks of complications. Further research is needed to explore strategies that would allow for improvement in identifying and treating patients with CES in a timely manner.

Level of evidence: Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/B193).

References

    1. Mixter WJ, Barr JS. Rupture of the intervertebral disc with involvement of the spinal canal. N Engl J Med. 1934:211(5):210-5.
    1. Hoeritzauer I, Wood M, Copley PC, Demetriades AK, Woodfield J. What is the incidence of cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;32(6):832-41.
    1. Woodfield J, Lammy S, Jamjoom AAB, Fadelalla MA, Copley PC, Arora M, Glasmacher SA, Abdelsadg M, Scicluna G, Poon MT, Pronin S, Leung AH, Darwish S, Demetriades AK, Brown J, Eames N, Statham PF, Hoeritzauer I. Demographics of cauda equina syndrome: a population-based incidence study. Neuroepidemiology. 2022;56(6):460-8.
    1. Podnar S. Epidemiology of cauda equina and conus medullaris lesions. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35(4):529-31.
    1. Ahn UM, Ahn NU, Buchowski JM, Garrett ES, Sieber AN, Kostuik JP. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(12):1515-22.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources