Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2025 Mar 11;104(5):e210275.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210275. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

Association of Social Determinants of Health With Genetic Test Request and Completion Rates in Children With Neurologic Disorders

Affiliations
Observational Study

Association of Social Determinants of Health With Genetic Test Request and Completion Rates in Children With Neurologic Disorders

Jordan Janae Cole et al. Neurology. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background and objectives: Genetic testing is critical for optimal diagnosis and management of pediatric neurology patients, but access is challenging. We investigated whether social determinants of health (SDOH) were associated with genetic testing among pediatric neurology patients in a retrospective observational study.

Methods: Electronic health record data were extracted from pediatric outpatients (0-18 years) evaluated at a single tertiary care institution between July 2018 and January 2020. Genetic testing requests, insurance denials, and test completion rates were compared among non-Hispanic single-racial or multiracial Black (Black) vs non-Hispanic single-racial White (White) patients. SDOH and clinical variables including ethnoracial identity, insurance type, Area Deprivation Index, rural urban commuting area, sex, age, diagnoses, and number of neurology visits were evaluated to identify associations with chromosomal microarray (CMA), multigene panel (MGP), and exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS) test completion.

Results: Of 11,371 patients (mean age 9.25 years; 46.1% female), 554 (4.9%) completed ≥1 genetic test in the study interval, with White patients nearly twice as likely to have completed ≥1 genetic test compared with Black patients (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.51). Outpatient pediatric neurology was the most common specialty through which testing was completed. Neurology provider request rates for genetic testing did not differ by patient ethnoracial identity, but insurance denial rates after neurology request were lower for White vs Black patients (relative rate ratio [RR] 0.44, 95% CI 0.27-0.73), and those with public insurance were less likely to complete genetic testing after it was requested through neurology (aOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.97). However, when considering individual genetic test types completed through any specialty, insurance type was significantly associated only with MGP completion (public vs private OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.77), not CMA or ES/GS.

Discussion: Marked ethnoracial disparities in genetic testing completion were identified despite equivalent rates of genetic testing requests by neurologists. While Black patients had higher rates of insurance denials, insurance type itself accounted for the disparity in MGP but not CMA or ES/GS completion. Other unmeasured barriers stemming from systemic racism likely affected genetic testing among Black patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.J. Cole was funded by NIH grant 5K12NS098482 and received research support for this manuscript from the WUSTL Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (NIH grant UL1TR002345) and from the WUSTL Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (NIH grant P50HD103525). J.P. Williams, A.D. Sellitto, L.R. Baratta, J.B. Huecker, D. Baldridge, and T. Kannampallil report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. C.A. Gurnett was funded by NIH grant R01AR067715. J.E. Balls-Berry reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.

Update of

References

    1. Malinowski J, Miller DT, Demmer L, et al. Systematic evidence-based review: outcomes from exome and genome sequencing for pediatric patients with congenital anomalies or intellectual disability. Genet Med. 2020;22(6):986-1004. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0771-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Srivastava S, Love-Nichols JA, Dies KA, et al. Meta-analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders. Genet Med. 2019;21(11):2413-2421. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0554-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sheidley BR, Malinowski J, Bergner AL, et al. Genetic testing for the epilepsies: a systematic review. Epilepsia. 2022;63(2):375-387. doi: 10.1111/epi.17141 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Srivastava S, Lewis SA, Cohen JS, et al. Molecular diagnostic yield of exome sequencing and chromosomal microarray in cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(12):1287-1295. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3549 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ontario Health (Quality). Genome-wide sequencing for unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies: a health technology assessment. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020;20(11):1-178. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources