Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jan 27;17(3):460.
doi: 10.3390/nu17030460.

Oral Probiotics to Prevent Recurrent Vulvovaginal Infections During Pregnancy-Multicenter Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Oral Probiotics to Prevent Recurrent Vulvovaginal Infections During Pregnancy-Multicenter Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Zohar Nachum et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Objective: During pregnancy, vulvovaginal infections (VVIs), including abnormal vaginal flora (AVF), bacterial vaginosis (BV), and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), are associated with serious complications and discomfort. We aimed to elucidate the effectiveness of oral probiotics in secondary prevention of VVIs in pregnant women. Study design: A multicenter prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at three medical centers between 2016 and 2021. Women who complained of vaginal symptoms with positive smear for AVF/BV and/or candida were treated with antibiotics or an antimycotic agent, respectively. After confirmation of VVI eradiation by repeated vaginal smear, the women were divided into a research group, receiving two capsules/day of oral probiotic formula containing Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus (L.) acidophilus, L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus and Streptococcus thermophilus (>6 × 109 CFU/capsule), and a control group, receiving a placebo (two capsules/day) until delivery. At least once a month or following complaints, a vaginal smear was taken to assess vaginal microbiota. If VVIs were found, they were treated with antibiotics/antimycotics, and eradication was assessed by a repeated vaginal smear. Lactobacilli vaginal colonization, including the specific strains from the probiotic capsules, were detected using the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI TOF-MS). The primary outcome was the rate of women who developed VVI during the study period until delivery. Results: Twenty-three and twenty-four women were analyzed in the probiotic and placebo cohorts, respectively. There was no difference in the rate of any VVI between the probiotic and placebo cohorts (16 (67%) versus 11 (48%), respectively; p = 0.19), time until first infection or pregnancy outcomes. The lactobacilli strains that colonized the vagina were similar at baseline and following probiotic or placebo administration. No woman was detected with vaginal colonization of the strains from the capsule, although the probiotics were taken for about 4 months. Conclusions: The oral probiotic product tested in this study did not reduce the recurrence rate of VVIs in pregnant women following eradication.

Keywords: abnormal vaginal flora; bacterial vaginosis; pregnancy; probiotics; secondary prevention; vulvovaginal candidiasis; vulvovaginal infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The rate of vulvovaginal infections (VVIs) throughout this study in the probiotic (N = 24) and placebo (N = 23) groups. The study participants were invited for a vaginal swab once in every month until delivery. Repeated vaginal swabs for verifying VVI eradication are not presented. p > 0.05 for all the time points.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier survival curve representing the time from enrollment to the first vulvovaginal infection.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage of vaginal lactobacilli (L.) strains from the study participants according to the study groups at baseline (lower panel; N = 22 in the probiotic group and N = 19 in the placebo group) and in the last vaginal culture (upper panel; N = 24 in the probiotic group and N = 23 in the placebo group).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Martin D.H. The Microbiota of the Vagina and Its Influence on Women’s Health and Disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2012;343:2–9. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31823ea228. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sobel J.D. Vulvovaginal Candidosis. Lancet. 2007;369:1961–1971. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60917-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carey J.C., Klebanoff M.A., Hauth J.C., Hillier S.L., Thom E.A., Ernest J.M., Heine R.P., Nugent R.P., Fischer M.L., Leveno K.J., et al. Metronidazole to Prevent Preterm Delivery in Pregnant Women with Asymptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;342:534–540. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002243420802. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerede A., Nikolettos K., Vavoulidis E., Margioula-Siarkou C., Petousis S., Giourga M., Fotinopoulos P., Salagianni M., Stavros S., Dinas K., et al. Vaginal Microbiome and Pregnancy Complications: A Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:3875. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133875. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGregor J.A., French J.I. Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2000;55:1–19. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200005001-00001. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources