Comparison of moxalactam and cefazolin as prophylactic antibiotics during cesarean section

Abstract

Prophylactic antibiotics have been shown to be effective in decreasing the incidence of febrile morbidity associated with cesarean section after labor. However, the relative effectiveness of different single antibiotics has been studied infrequently, and these investigations have been limited by small patient samples. Several new, broad-spectrum antibiotics are now available, and any further benefit from more traditional antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis remains untested. A randomized prospective double-blind therapeutic trial was therefore undertaken to compare the value of a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin) with a new third-generation cephalosporin (moxalactam). Between July 1981 and June 1983, 254 qualifying women who underwent primary cesarean section after labor were randomly chosen for either of the two treatment groups. Although not statistically significant, the rates of febrile morbidity, wound infection, and endometritis were less for those treated with cefazolin (4.0, 3.2, and 0.8%, respectively) than for those treated with moxalactam (9.2, 7.7, and 1.6%, respectively). No serious adverse effects were apparent in the mother and newborn infant from short-term exposure to either drug. Although the newer, more expensive, and broader-spectrum cephalosporin, moxalactam, was associated with a low postoperative febrile morbidity rate and short postpartum hospitalization, it was no more beneficial than cefazolin.