A qualitative assessment of behavioral interview method among anesthesiology residency applicants
- PMID: 39944716
- PMCID: PMC11820168
- DOI: 10.52965/001c.124488
A qualitative assessment of behavioral interview method among anesthesiology residency applicants
Abstract
Background: The objective of residency recruitment is to select the most appropriate candidate. While cognitive skills are identified before an interview and can be measured objectively, non-cognitive skills can be harder to discern. These non-cognitive skills though are a good predictors of future residency performance. A structured behavioral interview is better at identifying noncognitive skills compared to a traditional interview.
Objective: Compare the noncognitive traits identified in the interviews with those identified in resident evaluations.
Methods: Using the semi-annual evaluations 6 residents were split between satisfactory group and excellent group. Behavioral-based interviews and traditional unstructured interviews conducted on the same individual were compared and the results of the interview were compared to the semi-annual and annual evaluations submitted by the teaching faculty and the program directors. The interviews were analyzed for non-cognitive skills.
Results: Qualitative analysis of behavioral interview narratives and the narrative part of the semiannual evaluations independently identified the non-cognitive characteristics of adaptability, decisiveness, time management, judgment, and the ability to work in a team. It also identified other essential non-cognitive skills necessary for an anesthesiologist, such as ability to prioritize, study techniques, ability to destress.
Conclusion: The noncognitive traits found in the excellent group response to the structured interview match those found in the semi-annual evaluations. In this case individuals who are suited to the field of anesthesiology are adaptable, decisive, team-players with excellent judgment.
Keywords: anesthesiology; anesthesiology applicants; behavioral; residency interviews.
Conflict of interest statement
No relevant COI to disclose No funding provided. No conferences or other presentation for this work.
References
-
- Use of the Interview in Resident Candidate Selection: A Review of the Literature. Stephenson-Famy A., Houmard B. S., Oberoi S., Manyak A., Chiang S., Kim S. 2015J Grad Med Educ. 7(4):539–548. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00236.1. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00236.1 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- National Resident Matching Program 2024Results and Data: 2024 Main Residency Match®.
-
- Resident Recruitment Costs: A National Survey of Internal Medicine Program Directors. Brummond A., Sefcik S., Halvorsen A. J.., et al. 2013Am J Med. 126(7):646–653. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.03.018 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
-
- Reimagining Residency Selection: Part 1—A Practical Guide to Recruitment in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Haas M. R. C., He S., Sternberg K.., et al. 2020J Grad Med Educ. 12(5):539–544. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00907.1. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-20-00907.1 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Predicting Performance of First-Year Residents: Correlations Between Structured Interview, Licensure Exam, and Competency Scores in a Multi-Institutional Study. Marcus-Blank B., Dahlke J. A., Braman J. P.., et al. 2019Academic Medicine. 94(3):378–387. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002429. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002429 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
