Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):157-161.
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001476. Epub 2025 Feb 14.

Ethics for the labor and delivery unit

Affiliations
Review

Ethics for the labor and delivery unit

David G Mann et al. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. .

Abstract

Purpose of review: The labor and delivery unit poses unique challenges for the clinician faced with an ethical dilemma. Ethics training for physicians is heterogeneous and may not include specifics that are relevant to the obstetric anesthesiologist such as the implications of caring for a maternal-fetal dyad.

Recent findings: Rapid changes to the reproductive healthcare landscape have impacted healthcare professionals in recent years, who are at risk for moral distress when faced with ethical dilemmas in clinical care.

Summary: Principlism is the most commonly applied ethical theory in clinical medicine. The four principles are autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. These principles are prima facie in that no one is defined as being consistently more important than another; it is the clinical situation that determines how to prioritize the principles. This framework allows the obstetric anesthesiologist to assess and manage each of these principles to provide ethically appropriate care for their patient. The aim of this article is to provide the obstetric anesthesiologist with an understanding of the foundational ethical principles that impact the ability to fulfill their fiduciary duty to advocate for patients by offering, and with informed consent, providing indicated and appropriate interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Desai A, Holliday R, Wallis M, et al. Policy changes as a context for moral injury development in the Wake of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization. Obstet Gynecol. 2023; 141:15–21.
    1. Delgado C, Davies J. Ethical care of pregnant patients during labor, delivery, and nonobstetric surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2024; 42:503–514.
    1. Beauchamp TL. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics. 2003; 29:269–274.
    1. Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital 105 NE 92, 93. New York; 1914.
    1. Lo B. Assessing decision-making capacity. Law Med Health Care. 1990; 18:193–201.