Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;25(5):1256-1272.
doi: 10.1037/emo0001490. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

Working through emotions: Sadness predicts social engagement and physiologic linkage for men and disengagement for women in dyadic interactions

Affiliations

Working through emotions: Sadness predicts social engagement and physiologic linkage for men and disengagement for women in dyadic interactions

Kareena S Del Rosario et al. Emotion. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

We investigated whether sadness leaves an "emotional residue" by inducing sadness in one individual and testing its transfer to an unaware new acquaintance. Participants (N = 230; 115 dyads) completed cooperative tasks in same-gender dyads. Before meeting, participants recalled a personal event. In half the dyads, one participant (sad actor) recalled a sad event, while their partner (sad-paired partner) recalled a neutral event. In control dyads, both participants recalled neutral events. We examined self-reported emotions, affective language, behavior, and measures of sympathetic arousal to capture physiologic linkage-the degree to which one partner's physiology at one moment, predicted their partner's physiology the next moment. Men in the sad actor condition exhibited greater engagement (smiled more, gestured more) and their partners showed stronger physiologic linkage than men in the control condition. Conversely, women in the sad actor condition were less expressive than women in the control condition (smiled less), and their partners showed weaker physiologic linkage to them compared to dyads in the control condition. These findings have important implications for how men and women regulate negative affect and respond to others' affective cues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahonen L, Cowley BU, Hellas A, & Puolamäki K (2018). Biosignals reflect pair-dynamics in collaborative work: EDA and ECG study of pair-programming in a classroom environment. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 3138. 10.1038/s41598-018-21518-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrett LF, & Bliss-Moreau E (2009). She’s emotional. He’s having a bad day: Attributional explanations for emotion stereotypes. Emotion, 9(5), 649–658. - PubMed
    1. Behrens F, & Kret ME (2019). The interplay between face-to-face contact and feedback on cooperation during real-life interactions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 43(4), 513–528.
    1. Berntson GG, Bigger JT Jr, Eckberg DL, Grossman P, Kaufmann PG, Malik M, ... & Van Der Molen MW (1997). Heart rate variability: Origins, methods, and interpretive caveats. Psychophysiology, 34(6), 623–648. - PubMed
    1. Black DE, & Vance MD (2021). Do first impressions last? The impact of initial assessments and subsequent performance on promotion decisions. Management Science, 67(7), 4556–4576.