Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jun;48(6):1846-1858.
doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02131-0. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

Effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure control on cardiovascular outcomes in adult patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Effect of intensive versus standard blood pressure control on cardiovascular outcomes in adult patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tatsuya Haze et al. Hypertens Res. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of intensive versus standard antihypertensive therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in adult patients with hypertension. The primary endpoints were composite cardiovascular events, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and serious adverse events. The secondary endpoints included cognitive impairment, hypotension, syncope, acute kidney injury, and composite renal outcomes. Eight trials classifying a systolic blood pressure (SBP) target of <130 mmHg as intensive control was adopted in the primary analysis. The intensive blood pressure (BP) control significantly reduced the relative risk (RR) for cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death compared to standard BP control (RR 0.83 [95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.90] and 0.74 [0.56-0.97], respectively). The intensive BP control tended to reduce the RR for all-cause death, but not significant (0.89 [0.78-1.02]). On the other hand, the intensive BP control significantly increased the RR for serious adverse events, hypotension, and syncope (1.59 [1.19-2.12], 1.96 [1.04-3.70], and 2.36 [1.95-2.85], respectively). The intensive BP control significantly increased the RR for acute kidney injury (2.65 [1.78-3.95]), but did not affect for composite renal outcomes (1.38 [0.83-2.31]). For cognitive impairment, no significant increase or decrease in risk was observed (0.93 [0.68-1.26]). Based on these findings, we recommend the intensive BP control targeting SBP below 130 mmHg to achieve significant reductions in cardiovascular events and cardiovascular death, accompanied by careful monitoring for potential adverse events including acute kidney injury, hypotension, syncope related with the intensive BP control.

Keywords: Adverse events; Cardiovascular death; Cardiovascular events; Intensive blood pressure control; Standard blood pressure control.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with ethical standards. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • JSH2025 guidelines new viewpoints.
    Ohya Y, Sakima A. Ohya Y, et al. Hypertens Res. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02296-8. Online ahead of print. Hypertens Res. 2025. PMID: 40707654 No abstract available.

References

    1. Fujiyoshi A, Ohkubo T, Miura K, Murakami Y, Nagasawa S-y, Okamura T, et al. Blood pressure categories and long-term risk of cardiovascular disease according to age group in Japanese men and women. Hypertens Res. 2012;35:947–53. - PubMed
    1. Takashima N, Ohkubo T, Miura K, Okamura T, Murakami Y, Fujiyoshi A, et al. Long-term risk of BP values above normal for cardiovascular mortality: a 24-year observation of Japanese aged 30 to 92 years. J Hypertens. 2012;30:2299–306. - PubMed
    1. Rapsomaniki E, Timmis A, George J, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Shah AD, Denaxas S, et al. Blood pressure and incidence of twelve cardiovascular diseases: lifetime risks, healthy life-years lost, and age-specific associations in 1.25 million people. Lancet. 2014;383:1899–911. - PubMed - PMC
    1. Flint AC, Conell C, Ren X, Banki NM, Chan SL, Rao VA, et al. Effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:243–51. - PubMed
    1. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:957–67. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources